bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hello Paul, Am Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 01:25:43PM +0100 schrieb Paul Garlick: > I have submitted a patch to fix the build of the python-dolfin-adjoint > package. It is bug #78978 [0]. > This completes the set of fixes for the fenics-related packages. thanks a lot for all your work on these packages

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Andreas, I have submitted a patch to fix the build of the python-dolfin-adjoint package. It is bug #78978 [0]. This completes the set of fixes for the fenics-related packages. Best regards, Paul. [0]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2025-07/msg00077.html

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > If you can keep me updated, I will continue following your progress > and try to push as soon as possible. I have submitted a patch to fix the build of the fenics package. It is bug #78954. In brief, I have removed references

bug#77195: hdf5-parallel-openmpi failure (was Re: bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics)

Hi Guix, I notice that the three hdf5-parallel-openmpi tests that have been failing are now skipped (commit 2dd09c786c). Thanks Ludo! Meanwhile, I have submitted a patch that fixes the fenics-dolfin build. Dolfin is the main library in the fenics package. The problem turned out to be an hdf5-re

bug#77195: hdf5-parallel-openmpi failure (was Re: bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics)

Hi, On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 11:23, Romain Garbage wrote: >> Three tests are now failing. This seems to be related to a recent >> commit, that re-enables Fortran support: >> >> https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror/commit/ca3be0964af171721123f97e0850b3e734a575f5 > > To my understanding, these tes

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Am Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 02:16:18PM +0100 schrieb Paul Garlick: > First up is an update of the scalapack package, which is a dependency > of petsc-openmpi. The current package has been failing to build, with > new test failures, for ten days or so. > I have submitted a patch that updates scalapack

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Guix, I have made some progress on the fenics packages. First up is an update of the scalapack package, which is a dependency of petsc-openmpi. The current package has been failing to build, with new test failures, for ten days or so. I have submitted a patch that updates scalapack to versio

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi, On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 10:28 +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Am Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:23:45AM +0200 schrieb Romain Garbage: > > Paul Garlick writes: > > > Three tests are now failing.  This seems to be related to a > > > recent > > > commit, that re-enables Fortran support: > > > https://codebe

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Am Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:23:45AM +0200 schrieb Romain Garbage: > Paul Garlick writes: > > Three tests are now failing. This seems to be related to a recent > > commit, that re-enables Fortran support: > > https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror/commit/ca3be0964af171721123f97e0850b3e734a575f5 > To

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Paul, Paul Garlick writes: > Three tests are now failing. This seems to be related to a recent > commit, that re-enables Fortran support: > > https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror/commit/ca3be0964af171721123f97e0850b3e734a575f5 To my understanding, these tests fail in a non-reproducible way

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Andreas, On Fri, 2025-05-09 at 20:56 +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > I was discouraged to try it myself, so it is good to have > a specialist look at it. Aha!  I have checked the build logs on ci.guix.gnu.org and I can see that some of the fenics dependencies are failing to build, Specifically,

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Am Fri, May 09, 2025 at 06:28:39PM +0100 schrieb Paul Garlick: > I am planning to look at this next week. My feeling is that the fix is > likely to a simple > one, so it is worth doing now (as opposed to waiting for fenicsx). Okay, that would be great and much appreciated! Since the package looks

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hello Andreas, Thank you for the reminder. I am planning to look at this next week. My feeling is that the fix is likely to a simple one, so it is worth doing now (as opposed to waiting for fenicsx). Best regards, Paul. On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 10:30 +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Paul, >

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hello Paul, just a quick reminder concerning the fenics-dolfin and related packages; do you think you will have the time to repair it/them (I am not sure which packages exactly are concerned, this seems to be a little complex of several related ones)? Or should we drop them and wait for fenicsx?

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Am Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 02:33:24PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > My understanding of is that only > ‘fenics-dolfin’ fails to build, so perhaps we could limit to this one > package? > No strong opinion though. Me neither. I tend to rather the other side, why s

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi Guix, Thank you for the notification that fenics-dolfin is not currently building. It has been a while :-) but I plan to resume maintaining the fenics packages in Guix by the end of this month. A quick look at the build log for fenics-dolfin suggests that the problem is VTK-related; possibly

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

The project is still alive but distracted from other sources now (listed above), I think we may sacrifice deprecated variant and will check how to bring a maintained version. No strong opinion to keep still working ones or delete them. VCS: https://github.incerto.xyz/; https://git.sr.ht/~hellseh

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Hi, Andreas Enge skribis: > Indeed, comments in our source code say that the fenics project has been > dormant for three years now. I think fenics-dolfin has not built for > months, probably years. So I suppose that nobody actually uses the > fenics packages in Guix, and I would suggest to remov

bug#77195: [PATCH 0/7] Remove fenics

Indeed, comments in our source code say that the fenics project has been dormant for three years now. I think fenics-dolfin has not built for months, probably years. So I suppose that nobody actually uses the fenics packages in Guix, and I would suggest to remove them all on or after May 1st. Patch