Hi David,
David Elsing skribis:
> Oh that's true, this is an additional problem. Would it make sense to
> add the parameters passed to `with-parameters' to the keys used in
> `mcached'? Then the parameters would have to be passed around quite a
> bit however...
> Alternatively, would it be possi
Hi Ludo',
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Something just came to mind: the object cache. The cache is keyed by
> object + system + target + grafts?; if there’s anything that influences
> what the object lowers to, changes are the object->derivation mapping is
> already cached and that other thing wil
Hi David,
David Elsing skribis:
> I noticed that 'with-parameters' from (guix gexp) does not work with
> Guile parameters used in package definitions. They are still set
> in 'lower-object', but not anymore when the monadic procedure returned
> by 'lower-object' is evaluated.
>
> Attached is an
Hello,
I noticed that 'with-parameters' from (guix gexp) does not work with
Guile parameters used in package definitions. They are still set
in 'lower-object', but not anymore when the monadic procedure returned
by 'lower-object' is evaluated.
Attached is an example for a package wrapped by 'with
