I sent a patch to this ticket yesterday, before remembering this morning
that y'all probably weren't auto-Cc'd on it by debbugs.
Please have a look over it, especially the tests, in case I missed some
functionality or misinterpreted some requirements.
This will probably be deserving of a news ite
Hi,
Brian Cully skribis:
> However, if ‘modify-services’ can be changed to do two passes, the first
> as a sanity check which verifies service references and raises errors,
> and the second to do the actual modification, that should work well. I'm
> not concerned with efficiency particularly. Un
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> It wasn’t really intended, more a side effect of the implementation, and
> I agree it should be fixed.
There have been a number of complaints about the behavior change, and I
think the patch should probably be reverted. My only intention was to
raise an error for the ca
Hi,
Josselin Poiret skribis:
> "David Wilson" writes:
>
>> Hi Guix!
>>
>> Recently there was a change to the behavior of `modify-services` that adds
>> logic to check for any unused clauses so that an exception can be raised to
>> alert the user of this case.
>>
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.or
merge 64106 63921
thankyou
Hi David,
"David Wilson" writes:
> Hi Guix!
>
> Recently there was a change to the behavior of `modify-services` that adds
> logic to check for any unused clauses so that an exception can be raised to
> alert the user of this case.
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/c
Hi Guix!
Recently there was a change to the behavior of `modify-services` that adds
logic to check for any unused clauses so that an exception can be raised to
alert the user of this case.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=181951207339508789b28ba7cb914f983319920f
It seems t
