Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Tournier writes:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> Well, part of the message is in: :-)
>>
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/875y987z1m@gmail.com
>
> Oh, a Mumi reference to a message ID! I didn't know it supported that,
> cool!
>
>> On Thu, 04 M
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Well, part of the message is in: :-)
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/875y987z1m@gmail.com
Oh, a Mumi reference to a message ID! I didn't know it supported that,
cool!
> On Thu, 04 May 2023 at 11:52, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>>
Hi Maxim,
Well, part of the message is in: :-)
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/875y987z1m@gmail.com
On Thu, 04 May 2023 at 11:52, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It seems a valid use case to have a channel that depends on an old Guix
> version. Should this be supported?
>
> If I could for
Hi,
Recently (after the last core-updates merge), I've had the following
failure on 'guix pull', caused by my 'sfl-guix-channel' channel [0]:
[0] https://gitlab.com/Apteryks/sfl-guix-channel
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix pull
[...]
\builder for
`/gnu/
