On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 08:40:36AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> This should allow you to proceed as usual:
[...]
Thanks! I've prepared the patch, availabe as part of this patch series:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/61947
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:23:13PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> It's indeed been applied upstream. Can't we just drop our local version
>> of it?
>
> Do I need to set the 'doc-supported?' value somehow for particular
> kernel versions? It would be helpful for
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 11:23:13PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It's indeed been applied upstream. Can't we just drop our local version
> of it?
Do I need to set the 'doc-supported?' value somehow for particular
kernel versions? It would be helpful for me if you could try it, if this
stuff is
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:55:51AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> .../patches/linux-libre-infodocs-target.patch | 88 ++
>
> This patch doesn't apply to linux-libre 6.2.1, as shown below. If I
> understand correctly, it's been applied upstream, but I don't u
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:55:51AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> .../patches/linux-libre-infodocs-target.patch | 88 ++
This patch doesn't apply to linux-libre 6.2.1, as shown below. If I
understand correctly, it's been applied upstream, but I don't understand
how to adjust things on our en
