bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > > [...] > >>> It seems to me that the rewriting options should be honored on any >>> packages being manipulated, whether they come from the Guix collection, >>> a file, a manifest or another

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: [...] >> It seems to me that the rewriting options should be honored on any >> packages being manipulated, whether they come from the Guix collection, >> a file, a manifest or another means. > > I’m not convinced; I think manifests shoul

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi Simon and Ludovic, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 10:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> How about using transformations right into your manifest? Would that >> work for you? > > Maxim reported a related issue [1]: > > bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'wit

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi, On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 10:23, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > How about using transformations right into your manifest? Would that > work for you? Maxim reported a related issue [1]: bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source' 1:

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hello, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > >>> But noticed that --with-source and --with-patch were not effective for >>> the jami-with-certs customized package provided by the >>> guix-pack-manifest.scm manifest. >> >> Indeed, that’s expected. >> >>> It seems to me t

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi Ludo! Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> But noticed that --with-source and --with-patch were not effective for >> the jami-with-certs customized package provided by the >> guix-pack-manifest.scm manifest. > > Indeed, that’s expected. > >> It seems to me that the rewriting options should be ho

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > I was trying to simplify the Jami packaging tooling using the latest > recursive '--with-source' transformation, like so (in a Makefile): > > define guix-pack-command > guix pack -C xz -f deb -f > extras/packaging/gnu-linux/guix/guix-pack-manifest.scm -v3 \ > --

bug#61676: package transformations not honored working from a manifest

Hi Guix, I was trying to simplify the Jami packaging tooling using the latest recursive '--with-source' transformation, like so (in a Makefile): --8<---cut here---start->8--- define guix-pack-command guix pack -C xz -f deb -f extras/packaging/gnu-linux/guix/gu