"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
>> pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) 写道：
>>> Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
>>> failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
>>
>> Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls fo
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道：
Is the actual release commit always on master
Yes.
Actually, that is what's known as ‘complete nonsense’ and the
correct answer is, of course, ‘no’.
Hmm. I'll have to actually test the RC to see what you mean.
Sorry for the noise.
Kind regs,
T G-R
signature
Hi'gain,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) 写道：
Huh I don’t understand. :) Had this been the 1.4.0 release,
reconfigure
would be impossible, unless --allow-downgrades.
I don't follow. Could you explain?
Is the actual release commit always on master
Yes. Does this cancel out the previous questi
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) 写道：
>> Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
>> failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
>
> Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls for -RC testing, but
> probably doesn't deserve a
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) 写道：
Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull,
it
failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls for -RC testing,
but probably doesn't deserve a bug report, since there's no bug.
WDY
Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
Regards,
Florian
