bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2023-02-14 Thread Marcel van der Boom
Looking at https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=024a8b39957203f3a3cb93c87746c35635b81e57 it might make sense to do the same for the 'powerpc64le' target as well?

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-08-09 Thread Marcel van der Boom
[Efraim Flashner]: [...] just removing the native-inputs field completely from 1.17 should try to make go-1.17 build with gccgo. Then try to build go@1.17. That does indeed start a gccgo build and fails after a while with this: ( https://dpaste.org/3UwS2 has more details) starting phase

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-08-04 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 11:02:53PM +0200, Marcel van der Boom wrote: > > [Efraim Flashner]: > > I'm currently working on bootstrapping go-1.17.11 directly from gccgo, > > so we'd be able to skip 1.16 entirely. Currently it works on > > x86_64-linux but not on riscv64-linux. If you want to test som

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-08-04 Thread Marcel van der Boom
[Efraim Flashner]: I'm currently working on bootstrapping go-1.17.11 directly from gccgo, so we'd be able to skip 1.16 entirely. Currently it works on x86_64-linux but not on riscv64-linux. If you want to test something like that on powerpc64le that'd be great. Sure, can you point me in the

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-08-04 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 06:24:47PM +0200, Marcel van der Boom wrote: > > I see that the full build log expired on the paste site. > > Is any additional info needed here, other than the excerpt of the log? > > I suspect the check error is a safety precaution to ensure executables are > of reasona

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-08-04 Thread Marcel van der Boom
I see that the full build log expired on the paste site. Is any additional info needed here, other than the excerpt of the log? I suspect the check error is a safety precaution to ensure executables are of reasonable size, but reasonable is perhaps a bit different on the POWER9 platform?

bug#56680: go-1.16.15 build fails in check phase on powerpc64le

2022-07-21 Thread Marcel van der Boom
During the check phase of building go-1.16.15 (as dependency of ungoogled-chromium) a failure occurs: https://dpaste.org/ib5CZ : --- FAIL: TestTrivialExecutable (3.43s) shared_test.go:484: file too large: got 202752, want <= 10 --- FAIL: TestTrivialExecutablePIE (0.61s) shared_tes