bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-07-06 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi again, [...] > Perhaps services should allow specifying the minimum required Shepherd > version, which Shepherd could ensure is met before attempting to restart > a service, printing something like: > > 'Could not restart service X due to unmet Shepherd version requirement; > the service will

bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-07-06 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
retitle 55898 Services depending on new Shepherd features may fail until a reboot thanks Hi, Maxim Cournoyer writes: [...] > I'm suspecting that given the service makes use of Shepherd 0.9 > features, perhaps it fails loading and the error is reported erroneously > that way... a reboot would t

bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-06-24 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
retitle 55898 jami service fails to start following reconfigure thanks Hello, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello Maxime, > > Maxime Devos writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 01:53 [-0400]: >>> I don't get it; how can the service runs fine in the instrumented VMs >>> the syste

bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-06-14 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello Maxime, Maxime Devos writes: > Maxim Cournoyer schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 01:53 [-0400]: >> I don't get it; how can the service runs fine in the instrumented VMs >> the system tests use, and fail in my updated machine?  Could it be a >> fault in 'guix deploy'? > > Maybe the shepherd has t

bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-06-11 Thread Maxime Devos
Maxim Cournoyer schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 01:53 [-0400]: > I don't get it; how can the service runs fine in the instrumented VMs > the system tests use, and fail in my updated machine?  Could it be a > fault in 'guix deploy'? Maybe the shepherd has the old (gnu build jami-service) module loaded

bug#55898: jami service failing following 'guix deploy' update

2022-06-10 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello Guix! After having fixed the tests of the jami-service-type and pushed the fix as 85b4dabd94d53f8179f31a42046cd83fc3a352fc, I was confident it would work, but my freshly 'guix deploy'ed machine says otherwise: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ sudo herd sto