Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> I split it up into a commit fixing openjdk 16 and one adding openjdk 17;
> I removed a duplicate phase from openjdk 17 and let it inherit the phases
> from openjdk 16.
>
> I’ve applied the patches to the “master” branch.
Very cool! Thank you!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unp
I split it up into a commit fixing openjdk 16 and one adding openjdk 17;
I removed a duplicate phase from openjdk 17 and let it inherit the phases from
openjdk 16.
I’ve applied the patches to the “master” branch.
Thanks!
--
Ricardo
Hi,
Julien Lepiller writes:
> Hi, I think you fixed openjdk16 instead of openjdk17, this makes the
> patch a bit confusing to read.
I didn’t fix openjdk16, it’s just the change detection in git that makes
it look like that because there are unchanged lines in-between.
I wish I could make that
Hi, I think you fixed openjdk16 instead of openjdk17, this makes the
patch a bit confusing to read.
Le Sun, 14 Nov 2021 21:59:44 +0100,
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" a écrit :
> Julien Lepiller writes:
>
> > Le Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:32:16 +0100,
> > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" a écrit :
> >
> >
Julien Lepiller writes:
> Le Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:32:16 +0100,
> "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" a écrit :
>
>> the attached patch adds openjdk@17
>>
>> Take care with updating packages depending on this, because the
>> changes to the module system can cause runtime failures.
> sorry for the delay
Le Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:32:16 +0100,
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch adds openjdk@17
>
> Take care with updating packages depending on this, because the
> changes to the module system can cause runtime failures.
>
Hi!
sorry for the delay. I tried your patch,
Hi,
the attached patch adds openjdk@17
Take care with updating packages depending on this, because the changes
to the module system can cause runtime failures.
From 23d8220c78a9ac6aa84dff96fd0c0a1d8214a699 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:21:41 +0100
