bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

Hi, On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 12:57, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:27:45AM +0200, zimoun wrote: >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> $ guix graph --path guile-gnunet -e '(@@ (gnu packages tls) openssl-1.0)' >> guix graph: erreur : pas de chem

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:27:45AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 18:12, Leo Famulari wrote: > > With commit 12099eac1b161d364be923451d27d7d739d0f14d, nothing is using > > openssl-1.0 except for the Rust bootstrap. > > > > If I understand correctly, the plan is to "upgr

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

Hi Leo, On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 18:12, Leo Famulari wrote: > With commit 12099eac1b161d364be923451d27d7d739d0f14d, nothing is using > openssl-1.0 except for the Rust bootstrap. > > If I understand correctly, the plan is to "upgrade" that bootstrap path, > and eventually we won't need a package of

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

With commit 12099eac1b161d364be923451d27d7d739d0f14d, nothing is using openssl-1.0 except for the Rust bootstrap. If I understand correctly, the plan is to "upgrade" that bootstrap path, and eventually we won't need a package of openssl-1.0 at all. I'm marking this bug as done.

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 09:10:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > I sent a patch to remove Dillo: > > Actually, I went ahead and sent some followup patches to remove everything else, too. Except for VDE-2, which there is a patch for.

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 09:04:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > I think we should either remove OpenSSL as a dependency of Dillo, or > remove Dillo altogether. It's a simple package definition and Dillo > users can use it in a private channel, or maybe it could be added to > guix-past. I sent a pa

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 09:55:45PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > dillo: > > Does not build with current OpenSSL > > Status? https://www.dillo.org/Plans.html > > No dependents > > This one confuses me. I was able to build dillo wit

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 09:55:45PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Here are my notes on the users of the openssl-1.0 package: > > > > File: rust.scm > > > File: crates-io.scm > > > > For the Rust bootstrap, we can keep openssl-1.0

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Here are my notes on the users of the openssl-1.0 package: > > > File: web-browsers.scm > > dillo: > Does not build with current OpenSSL > Status? https://www.dillo.org/Plans.html > No dependents This one confuses me. I was able to

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:54:03PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > vde2: > Does not build with current OpenSSL. > Dependency changed to WolfSSL (unpackaged): > https://github.com/virtualsquare/vde-2/issues/2 > Depended on by QEMU but not qemu-minimal (optional): This is addressed by

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

Here are my notes on the users of the openssl-1.0 package: > File: networking.scm pidentd: Does not build with current OpenSSL, no newer releases or development No dependents vde2: Does not build with current OpenSSL. Dependency changed to WolfSSL (unpackaged): https://github.com/virtualsquare/v

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

Hi Leo, On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 22:43, Leo Famulari wrote: > > OpenSSL 1.0 is no longer supported as free software. As research > continues, new bugs are discovered and there are no fixes available. > > We should remove it soon. Since Qt 4 depends on it, we can remove them > at the same time [0].

bug#46602: Removing OpenSSL 1.0

OpenSSL 1.0 is no longer supported as free software. As research continues, new bugs are discovered and there are no fixes available. We should remove it soon. Since Qt 4 depends on it, we can remove them at the same time [0]. Some packages will probably have to be removed, since they depend on O