Hi Maxim,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 at 07:14, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>> The syntax across the different importers are not uniform. Especially,
>> compare:
>>
>>guix import hackage mtl@2.1.3.1
>>guix import pypi itsdangerous@1.1.0
>>
>> and worse, the option ’--recursive’ lea
Hi,
zimoun writes:
> Dear,
>
> The syntax across the different importers are not uniform. Especially,
> compare:
>
>guix import hackage mtl@2.1.3.1
>guix import pypi itsdangerous@1.1.0
>
> and worse, the option ’--recursive’ leads to an error for the latter.
> Note that instead:
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 01:09, Lulu wrote:
> Okay, I tested this a bit and it seems to work fine. I'm going to write formal
> tests for it (and other importers, if possible) later.
Usually, we try to use the option ’--reroll-count’ of git-format-patch
for the second (or third or more) version
Okay, I tested this a bit and it seems to work fine. I'm going to write formal
tests for it (and other importers, if possible) later.
--
Lulu
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 at 23:50, Lulu wrote:
> I just sent in a patch to fix this for the pypi importer, although
> ideally we'd want versioning support for all importers with a uniform
> syntax.
The uniform syntax is ’@’. However, it is importer by importer (case by
case) since the external A
I just sent in a patch to fix this for the pypi importer, although
ideally we'd want versioning support for all importers with a uniform
syntax.
I poked and prodded at the RubyGems API to see if it can do what PyPI
can. It's unfortunately much more limited: API v1 provides a method
for querying al
Dear,
The syntax across the different importers are not uniform. Especially,
compare:
guix import hackage mtl@2.1.3.1
guix import pypi itsdangerous@1.1.0
and worse, the option ’--recursive’ leads to an error for the latter.
Note that instead:
guix import pypi itsdangerous/1.1.0
perfe
