Hello!
[...]
>> gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 37 -
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
>> index 03c28ee7a7..b3d099257d 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for the feedback!
Pierre Langlois writes:
> I agree in general it's good to reuse code, however in this particular
> case it's probably better to keep the phases duplicated. For example,
> in the future one could update the emacs-next package to not require a
> revision numbe
Hi Morgan,
morgan.j.sm...@outlook.com writes:
> From: Morgan Smith
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs):
> [strip-double-wrap] Modify to work with emacs-next
>
> * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-next):
> [version] Change version from 28.0.50.1 to 28.0.50
> [arguments] Removed field
> [native-sear
Hello guix-devel,
I fear this patch may get lost (as it has not received feedback since I
posted it on Sept 14th (ok maybe I'm just being impatient but I'd like
to think emacs-next is an important package)) so I've decided to post it
in guix-devel. While I'm here I might as well add some much need
From: Morgan Smith
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs):
[strip-double-wrap] Modify to work with emacs-next
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-next):
[version] Change version from 28.0.50.1 to 28.0.50
[arguments] Removed field
[native-search-paths] New field
---
The problem turned out to be that EMACS
