Hi,
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Diego Nicola Barbato writes:
[...]
>>> I’ve reverted the patch in 5aa4d2dcf2f4f8786358feb45338893ed08a4cd9.
>>>
>>> Diego: I guess we can reinstate the patch “later”, once Shepherd 0.8 can
>>> be considered widespread.
>>
>> I'm sorry I broke reconfigure and deploy
Diego Nicola Barbato writes:
> Hey,
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello Alex & Marius,
>>
>> Marius Bakke skribis:
>>
>>> Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
>>> writes:
>>>
Hello,
I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the
recent
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> [...]
>
> This issue has been reported by a number of users on IRC. I think the
> problem is that the the #:file-creation-mask keyword requires support
> from the running Shepherd, which may not have it yet. I think we should
> revert commit 4c0cc
Hey,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Alex & Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>> Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
>> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the
>>> recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit
Hello Alex & Marius,
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the
>> recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit
>> 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec
Hi Alex,
Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
writes:
> Hello,
>
> I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the
> recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit
> 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec might have introduced a bug.
>
> From my testi
Hello,
I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy. It seems that the
recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit
4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec might have introduced a bug.
>From my testing, guix deploy currently consistently fails with:
-8<---
