Hello Diego,
Diego Nicola Barbato writes:
> Hey,
>
> Diego Nicola Barbato writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Apparently there is nothing wrong with the slider. Instead matrix
>> multiplication, which is used under the hood for transformations, seems
>> to sometimes produce incorrect results on i686-linux.
Hey,
Diego Nicola Barbato writes:
[...]
> Apparently there is nothing wrong with the slider. Instead matrix
> multiplication, which is used under the hood for transformations, seems
> to sometimes produce incorrect results on i686-linux. I have reported
> this as a separate bug (https://debbu
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 06:18:28PM +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
> I was opposed to this at first (after all, if upstream supports Numpy on
> i686, why shouldn't we?), but after seeing that even simple things like
> matrix multiplication can produce incorrect results I'm in favour of
> limitin
Hi,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:20:08PM +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
>> The package python-matplotlib fails to build during the check phase on
>> i686-linux. The test failure appears to be deterministic:
I've taken a closer look at the failing test (on x86_64-linux,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:20:08PM +0200, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote:
> The package python-matplotlib fails to build during the check phase on
> i686-linux. The test failure appears to be deterministic:
I wonder if this scientific computing stuff should be tried on i686 at
all. Should we limit it
Hi Guix,
The package python-matplotlib fails to build during the check phase on
i686-linux. The test failure appears to be deterministic:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
=== FAILURES ===
___
