Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>> 'python2-sphinx' is obsolete and increasingly a maintenance burden,
>> because we need to keep special versions around just to make it build.
>>
>> The only reason we have this package is because it gets pulled in
>> automatically when
Hi!
Marius Bakke skribis:
> 'python2-sphinx' is obsolete and increasingly a maintenance burden,
> because we need to keep special versions around just to make it build.
>
> The only reason we have this package is because it gets pulled in
> automatically when using (package-with-python2 ...) on
> The only reason we have this package is because it gets pulled in
> automatically when using (package-with-python2 ...) on a Python 3
> package that has 'python-sphinx' in inputs.
I think the problem here, is that (package-with-python2 ...) overwrites
all sorts of inputs per package-mapping. Per
Guix,
'python2-sphinx' is obsolete and increasingly a maintenance burden,
because we need to keep special versions around just to make it build.
The only reason we have this package is because it gets pulled in
automatically when using (package-with-python2 ...) on a Python 3
package that has 'py
