Hi,
Bengt Richter skribis:
> Did that commit cause an automatic update to the tarball
> found and used by the binary install script [1] ??
No, it didn’t automatically create a new Guix release.
> commit 7842ddcbc118cbc2799e22651732b7cdc06b93ee
> Author: Ludovic Courtès
> Date: Sun Jan 19 22
Hi Ludo,
On +2020-01-19 23:12:43 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Wette skribis:
>
> > This guix-1.0.1 on x86_64 Fedora 30.
> >
> > After installing as root, it's not clear from the manual how users
> > should start.
> > I found out "guix pull" is the right thing.
> > Maybe add
Hi Matt,
Matt Wette skribis:
> This guix-1.0.1 on x86_64 Fedora 30.
>
> After installing as root, it's not clear from the manual how users
> should start.
> I found out "guix pull" is the right thing.
> Maybe add that to the manual? (Or add a "guix init" command.)
“guix pull” brings you an up-t
This guix-1.0.1 on x86_64 Fedora 30.
After installing as root, it's not clear from the manual how users
should start.
I found out "guix pull" is the right thing.
Maybe add that to the manual? (Or add a "guix init" command.)
Here is the error that I get w/o "guix pull":
[mwette@localhost ~]$ g
