Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Yes, I testsed on commit
> 614a1e3fa2d731d4719f03912b1b87fb4fd309cb, which should be broken.
Closing this forgotten "bug".
Please do submit a patch if you'd like to document this.
Thanks,
Maxim
Hi Ludo,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 15:36, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> All that said, I think it’s fine to recommend “guix pull -p” in the
> manual, but I just wanted to make sure people know about “make
> as-derivation”, which can be slightly more convenient in cases where you
> don’t want to commit t
Yes, I testsed on commit
614a1e3fa2d731d4719f03912b1b87fb4fd309cb, which should be broken.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> It works now, however it does not detect breakages like "guix pull -p
> ..." does.
Do you have a specific example in mind? They normally build the exact
same thing.
All that said, I think it’s fine to recommend “guix pull -p” in the
manual, but I just wa
Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> $ guix environment guix -- make as-derivation
> Building Guix in Guix...
> warning: 'nix-server-socket' is deprecated, use 'store-connection-socket'
> instead
> warning: 'nix-server-major-version' is deprecated, use
> 'store-connection-major-version' instead
> w
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 12:20, zimoun wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 10:45, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> > I tried it on two recent commits
> > (including eb8aad6a23442cf7b23e0df88b89b4cd030dfbf5) and I get
>
> Is it a pushed commit? Or a local one?
My bad. I find the commit. :-)
But I do not ex
Hi Pierre,
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 10:45, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I tried it on two recent commits
> (including eb8aad6a23442cf7b23e0df88b89b4cd030dfbf5) and I get
Is it a pushed commit? Or a local one?
[...]
> Any idea?
I have no idea. It can only propose to try to reproduce. If you send
w
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 01:12, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > “make as-derivation” achieves more or less the same.
>
> Is this be good enough to test guix pull?
Have you tried to run the current test suite on the commit you
recently sent breaking "guix pull"
Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> “make as-derivation” achieves more or less the same.
>
> Is this be good enough to test guix pull?
It should be, though I noticed that Mark reported a bug recently so we
need to check.
Ludo’.
Hi,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> The current way to do it is to run
>
> guix pull --url=/path/to/checkout --profile=/tmp/guix.master
“make as-derivation” achieves more or less the same.
Now, as you know, this can be CPU-intensive, so I’m afraid we cannot
have “make check” do that systematical
Hi,
Thank Pierre to raise this issue.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 16:40, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> The current way to do it is to run
>
> guix pull --url=/path/to/checkout --profile=/tmp/guix.master
When I put that in a test -- say tests/guix-pull.sh -- troubles
arises... The main one appears beca
It would be nice to add a `guix pull' test as part of the test suite.
This was discussed in bug #38455.
The test should run `guix pull' but not apply change any symlink.
Note that `guix pull --dry-run' does not catch enough errors.
The current way to do it is to run
guix pull --url=/path/to/c
12 matches
Mail list logo
