Arne,
Arne Babenhauserheide 写道：
Aren’t we overblocking here?
As of current master: very likely :-(
Regardless of (y)our opinions on commerce and freedom, downloading
executables that violate GNU's own Free Software Distribution
Guidelines is simply not an option.
However, it's very likely
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> They patch[0] it to hide the Updater by default but it's trivial to
> reënable (tested):
>
> $ echo 'menu_show_core_updater = "false"' >> \
> ~/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg
>
> This does not appease me. I'm implementing more
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道：
$ echo 'menu_show_core_updater = "false"'
^
"true", of course…
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道：
I'm looking into this now.
So I've installed Retroarch on Debian.
They patch[0] it to hide the Updater by default but it's trivial
to reënable (tested):
$ echo 'menu_show_core_updater = "false"' >> \
~/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg
This does not appease me
Ludovic Courtès 写道：
Would you be able to help with that? Hopefully there are
patches we can
take from Debian, no?
If nobody can work on it in a timely fashion, I would propose to
remove
retroarch until someone can do this work.
I'm looking into this now.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.a
Hi Nicolò,
Nicolò Balzarotti skribis:
> We don't provide them _directly_, but when loading the program the first
> option is "Load core". Then, first option again, is "Download core". Here
> you have a list of "proprietary" .so.zip downloads. Retroarch, as far as I
> understand, is encouraging t
Nicolò Balzarotti writes:
>> Aren’t we overblocking here? This is not a case of a program restricted
>> to push someone into proprietary software, but a case of a program
>> restricted to not-for-profit for everybody.
>>
> This is, by (some) definition, non free.
Yes.
>> It is a similar case a
Hi,
Il giorno mer 27 nov 2019 alle ore 21:48 Arne Babenhauserheide <
arne_...@web.de> ha scritto:
>
> Jesse Gibbons writes:
> > On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 00:26 +0100, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:
> > I can confirm that snes9x is nonfree because it is only for
> non-commercial
> > use. We should at least
Jesse Gibbons writes:
> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 00:26 +0100, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:
> I can confirm that snes9x is nonfree because it is only for non-commercial
> use. We should at least patch that out before the cores are available. I
> don't know about the other one.
Aren’t we overblocking her
On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 00:26 +0100, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:
> Hi Ludo, thanks for your response.
>
> We don't provide them _directly_, but when loading the program the first
> option is "Load core". Then, first option again, is "Download core". Here
> you have a list of "proprietary" .so.zip downl
Hi Ludo, thanks for your response.
We don't provide them _directly_, but when loading the program the first
option is "Load core". Then, first option again, is "Download core". Here
you have a list of "proprietary" .so.zip downloads. Retroarch, as far as I
understand, is encouraging the download o
Hello,
Nicolò Balzarotti skribis:
> We might have a problem on how retroarch is packaged. I've never used it,
> tried just now. There's the "core download" section where it downloads
> "$core.so.zip". Those are .so files:
> .config/retroarch/cores/atari800_libretro.so: file format elf64-x86-
Hello guix!
How I reported today on the IRC #guix channel:
We might have a problem on how retroarch is packaged. I've never used it,
tried just now. There's the "core download" section where it downloads
"$core.so.zip". Those are .so files:
.config/retroarch/cores/atari800_libretro.so: file f
13 matches
Mail list logo
