Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2019-11-11 10:10:10 -0500) wrote:
> Efraim Flashner (2019-11-11 11:27:30 +0200) wrote:
>
> > Some inline comments added. Patch pushed.
>
> […] I'll try to find a moment to test your patch and see if the `ipfs`
> binary doesn't segfault, then report back. […]
I tried your
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2019-11-11 10:10:10 -0500) wrote:
> […] I'm still attaching it in case you're curious (of course I don't expect
> any of it to get merged `;)`). […]
Forgot the attachment… `:P`
--
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/
>From 2e4cca87b865dbd26ee417775d543abab7ba4f53
Efraim Flashner (2019-11-11 11:27:30 +0200) wrote:
> Some inline comments added. Patch pushed.
Wow, thank you so much for taking care of this! I did prepare a patch on
Friday but I didn't have the time to send it, plus it pales in comparison to
Efraim's and it also had the `ipfs` binary segfault
Some inline comments added. Patch pushed.
--
Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> From 2db156170a24fea36aced781faf96c839a3b7d15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Efraim Flashner
> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 20:19:11 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: patchelf: Update to 0.10.
>
> * gnu/packages/elf.scm (patchelf): Update to 0.10.
> [source]: Remove patche