bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-28 Thread Jakob L. Kreuze
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Jakob, > > zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > >> Thanks for the input; I wasn't aware that the activation process was >> taking so long for some people. One of Ludovic's suggestions was to >> create a single derivation, rather than th

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-28 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Jakob, zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > Thanks for the input; I wasn't aware that the activation process was > taking so long for some people. One of Ludovic's suggestions was to > create a single derivation, rather than three, to speed up system > activation. I'll

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-28 Thread Jakob L. Kreuze
Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Hello again, > > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> As a bonus, this approach might solve another issue I've observed: on my >> Guix system, where I build everything locally, several derivations are >> built *during* activation. Based on the terminal output, I get the

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-28 Thread Jakob L. Kreuze
Hi Ludo, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Jakob, now that we generate scripts for the effectful bits of system > reconfiguration (one of these bits being service upgrades), couldn’t > we take it one step further and store those scripts in the “system” > derivation so we can run them eventually, notably

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-27 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello again, Mark H Weaver writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Jakob, now that we generate scripts for the effectful bits of system >> reconfiguration (one of these bits being service upgrades), couldn’t we >> take it one step further and store those scripts in the “system” >> derivation so

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-26 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Jakob, now that we generate scripts for the effectful bits of system > reconfiguration (one of these bits being service upgrades), couldn’t we > take it one step further and store those scripts in the “system” > derivation so we can run them eventually, notably upon

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey Chris & Jakob, Chris Marusich skribis: > zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > >> 'switch-to-system-generation' doesn't call out to >> 'upgrade-shepherd-services'. I'm not sure if this was an intentional >> decision or not > > It is intentional, but only because there

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-09 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Robert, Robert Vollmert writes: > On 8. Aug 2019, at 18:40, Chris Marusich wrote: >> zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: >> >>> 'switch-to-system-generation' doesn't call out to >>> 'upgrade-shepherd-services'. I'm not sure if this was an intentional >>> decision or n

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-08 Thread Robert Vollmert
On 8. Aug 2019, at 18:40, Chris Marusich wrote: > zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > >> 'switch-to-system-generation' doesn't call out to >> 'upgrade-shepherd-services'. I'm not sure if this was an intentional >> decision or not > > It is intentional, but only because t

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-08 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Jakob, zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > 'switch-to-system-generation' doesn't call out to > 'upgrade-shepherd-services'. I'm not sure if this was an intentional > decision or not It is intentional, but only because there is currently no way to call upgrade-shepherd

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-07 Thread Jakob L. Kreuze
Hi Chris, Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Could you look at bug #36878 and commit 1db6f137d... as of latest > master, is this fixed? Unfortunately, I don't think that 1db6f137d fixes this. The issue is a bit more structural as 'switch-to-system-generation' doesn't call out to 'upgrade-sheph

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-07 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Could you look at bug #36878 and commit 1db6f137d... as of latest master, is this fixed? Robert Vollmert writes: > Could we get some input on this bug? > > Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but it seems that a core guix > feature (atomic rollbacks) doesn’t work… > >> On 30. Jul 2019, at 12:00

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-06 Thread Robert Vollmert
Could we get some input on this bug? Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but it seems that a core guix feature (atomic rollbacks) doesn’t work… > On 30. Jul 2019, at 12:00, Robert Vollmert wrote: > > What I see: > > 1. edit ~/pzprnode/pzprnode > > rob@garp ~/pzprnode$ git diff > diff --git

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-08-06 Thread Robert Vollmert
Could we get some input on this bug? Maybe I’m misunderstanding something, but it seems that a core guix feature (atomic rollbacks) doesn’t work… > On 30. Jul 2019, at 12:00, Robert Vollmert wrote: > > What I see: > > 1. edit ~/pzprnode/pzprnode > > rob@garp ~/pzprnode$ git diff > diff --git

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-07-30 Thread Jakob L. Kreuze
Hi Robert, Robert Vollmert writes: > The line with “updated version” should not be there. > > Presumably, this is due to switch-generations not calling > upgrade-shepherd-services. I can confirm that 'switch-to-system-generation', the procedure that carries out 'guix system switch-generation',

bug#36855: guix system switch-generation doesn't

2019-07-30 Thread Robert Vollmert
What I see: 1. edit ~/pzprnode/pzprnode rob@garp ~/pzprnode$ git diff diff --git a/pzprnode b/pzprnode index 612e6a8..d8ef0ea 100755 --- a/pzprnode +++ b/pzprnode @@ -190,5 +190,6 @@ const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { }); server.listen(port, hostname, () => { + console.log