bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Hi Julien, On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 at 09:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> >> What do we do? Include the proposed patch? Other ideas? > > I think the initial patch doesn’t work reliably, as I wrote back then, > but something like that might work. Julien

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Hi, zimoun skribis: > This old report and associated patch is uncommented since a while? > > > > What do we do? Include the proposed patch? Other ideas? I think the initial patch doesn’t work reliably, as I wrote back then, but something like that

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Hi, This old report and associated patch is uncommented since a while? What do we do? Include the proposed patch? Other ideas? Cheers, simon

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Ping! :-) https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36374 Now’s a good time to fix this one! Ludo’. Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Hello! > > Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> Here is a patch to address this issue on Guix System. It creates new >> files in /etc/skel: an initial profile (.config/guix/init

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Hello! Julien Lepiller skribis: > Here is a patch to address this issue on Guix System. It creates new > files in /etc/skel: an initial profile (.config/guix/initial) tgat > only contains a symlink to /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix and > the current profile as a symlink to the initial prof

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

Le 25 juin 2019 16:08:19 GMT+02:00, "Ludovic Courtès" a écrit : >The article at > has a >screenshot showing ‘guix pull’ suggesting to run ‘guix pull && guix >package -u’. This is obviously wrong. > >Ludo’. Here is a patch to address this

bug#36374: ‘guix pull’ should not suggest running ‘guix pull’

The article at has a screenshot showing ‘guix pull’ suggesting to run ‘guix pull && guix package -u’. This is obviously wrong. Ludo’.