Alex Kost writes:
> I have noticed that description of the 'perl' package is:
>
> "Perl 5 is a highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over
> 24 years of development."
>
> Mentioning 24 years seems strange to me. Well, of course, "over 24
> years" will always be correct (as well a
I have noticed that description of the 'perl' package is:
"Perl 5 is a highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over
24 years of development."
Mentioning 24 years seems strange to me. Well, of course, "over 24
years" will always be correct (as well as "over 1 year"), but still :-)
