Hello,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>>> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
>>> 4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
>>
>> We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix. Since
>> versions are arbitrary strings “4
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
>> 4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
>
> We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix. Since
> versions are arbitrary strings “4.1” is considered a valid pr
Chris Marusich writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
>>> 4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
>>
>> We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix. Since
>> versions are arbitrary st
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
>> 4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
>
> We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix. Since
> versions are arbitrary strings “4.1” is considered a valid pr
Hi Mark,
> Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
> 4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
We consider everthing following the “@” a version string prefix. Since
versions are arbitrary strings “4.1” is considered a valid prefix of
“4.13”. If a user supplie
Currently, the package specification "linux-libre@4.1" selects version
4.13. It should instead select version 4.1.
Mark
