bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2021-11-25 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:01, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: >> >> > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2021-06-09 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 22:01, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: >> >> > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> > Currently, Go incremental builds and library r

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2021-01-11 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:46:48PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. > > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in > > Guix, unless I missed

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2021-01-11 Thread zimoun
Hi Leo, On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: > I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. > Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in > Guix, unless I missed a new development. Thanks. Could you provide a Go example for repro

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2020-12-18 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to > close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable > step. I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. Currently, Go increment

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2020-12-18 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 10:58, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:50:10PM -0500, Hank Donnay wrote: >> After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding >> `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. >> >> The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2017-02-25 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:50:10PM -0500, Hank Donnay wrote: > After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding > `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. > > The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the > generated source by the 'dist' tool, so chan

bug#25752: Acknowledgement (go incremental builds broken)

2017-02-24 Thread Hank Donnay
After talking on IRC, it seems like grafts are the problem. Adding `--no-grafts` to the above commands has them succeed. The GOROOT (store location, in this case) gets encoded in the generated source by the 'dist' tool, so changing that is going to cause issues. Is there a way to disable grafts o