On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:24:15PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 04:20:47PM -0800, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:57:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:11:13PM -0800, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> > > > I just wanted to
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:57:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:11:13PM -0800, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> > I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned
> > ~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan.
>
> Are the
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:11:13PM -0800, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned
> ~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan.
Are the files with the same SHA1 hashes still present?
dian_ce...@zoho.com writes:
> I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned
> ~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan.
>
>
>
>
>
So this issue is done and can be closed?
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ http://ng0.c
I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned
~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan.