bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-26 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:26:37AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > Should we try to evaluate this branch before staging? > > Yes, I just started a new evaluation. There are still some failing packages that we need to address: https:/

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-24 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Leo Famulari writes: > >> > Bah, I started a new one. > >> > >> Did this one get cancelled? Perhaps we should merge this to 'staging' > >

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-24 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> > Bah, I started a new one. >> >> Did this one get cancelled? Perhaps we should merge this to 'staging' >> and deal with any remaining failures when that is ready to be evaluated. > >

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-20 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > Bah, I started a new one. > > Did this one get cancelled? Perhaps we should merge this to 'staging' > and deal with any remaining failures when that is ready to be evaluated. Yes, it looks like that, althoug

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:55:54PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:47:59AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >> Whoops. Fixed in 7b6ff42aa3cf9398213d3c1f0e5f87c45a9730df. >> > >> > Thanks! I started a new evaluation. >> >

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-18 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:55:54PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:47:59AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Whoops. Fixed in 7b6ff42aa3cf9398213d3c1f0e5f87c45a9730df. > > > > Thanks! I started a new evaluation. > > Looks like this one timed out:

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-18 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:47:59AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Whoops. Fixed in 7b6ff42aa3cf9398213d3c1f0e5f87c45a9730df. > > Thanks! I started a new evaluation. Looks like this one timed out: https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/python-tests#tabs-errors signature.asc Des

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:47:59AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Whoops. Fixed in 7b6ff42aa3cf9398213d3c1f0e5f87c45a9730df. Thanks! I started a new evaluation. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:56:21PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 06:38:26PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> > Leo Famulari writes: >> > > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109396?full=1#tabs-unfinished >> > > >> > > I'd like to wait for it to be closer to do

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:56:21PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 06:38:26PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109396?full=1#tabs-unfinished > > > > > > I'd like to wait for it to be closer to done before merging. > > > > I

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 06:38:26PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109396?full=1#tabs-unfinished > > > > I'd like to wait for it to be closer to done before merging. > > I think that job can be cancelled and a new one started, since there > have be

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:02:20PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >> All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you >> >> restart it? >> > >> > Done, thanks fo

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 03:02:20PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you > >> restart it? > > > > Done, thanks for working on this! > > Most of

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-16 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you >> restart it? > > Done, thanks for working on this! Most of the current failures should now be fixed as well. Do you think another Hydra run

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-16 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 15.12.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Marius Bakke: > @Hartmut, what was your command for building everything python? :-) I have a script for this :-) But maybe there is a more inteligent way like: guix refresh -l python | sed 's/.*: //' | xargs guix build --keep-going -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Har

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-15 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you > restart it? Done, thanks for working on this! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-15 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:21:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >> >>> Yikes, I had hoped to avoid addressing that Nix issue and the humongous >> >>> "fix" for a while longer: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12552 >> >> >> >> This puill-request is huge

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-14 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:21:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >> >>> Yikes, I had hoped to avoid addressing that Nix issue and the humongous >> >>> "fix" for a while longer: >> >>> >> >>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12552 >> >> >> >> This puill-request is huge

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-13 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:21:44PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > >>> Yikes, I had hoped to avoid addressing that Nix issue and the humongous > >>> "fix" for a while longer: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12552 > >> > >> This puill-request is huge, but for setuptools, it comes d

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail

2016-12-13 Thread Marius Bakke
>>> Yikes, I had hoped to avoid addressing that Nix issue and the humongous >>> "fix" for a while longer: >>> >>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/12552 >> >> This puill-request is huge, but for setuptools, it comes down that they >> updated from 18.2 to 19.4. > > Sounds like we're going down

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-13 Thread Marius Bakke
Hartmut Goebel writes: > First of all thanks for spotting this bug. > >>> The bad news is that we have some breakages. >>> >>> 'python-py' fails with: >>> >>> TypeError: py.test.__dict__ is not a dictionary >>> >>> Which seems similar to >>> >>> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/12565#issue

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-12 Thread Hartmut Goebel
First of all thanks for spotting this bug. >> The bad news is that we have some breakages. >> >> 'python-py' fails with: >> >> TypeError: py.test.__dict__ is not a dictionary >> >> Which seems similar to >> >> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/12565#issuecomment-174165144 The relevant comme

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-12 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:54:40AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > The good news: the attached patch makes 'check' work as expected. The > bad news is that we have some breakages. > > 'python-py' fails with: > > TypeError: py.test.__dict__ is not a dictionary > > Which seems similar to > > https:/

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Marius Bakke
Marius Bakke writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> I noticed while building the package added by ng0's patch (below) that >> the test suite fails, but the check phase succeeds: >> >> [...] >> == >> ERROR: test_clone_with_credentia

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >> > Perhaps something like this would work (untested)? >> >> Oops, here is the patch I wanted to attach: > > Can you make it a patch? :) I'm testing it now on a branch, will report

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: > > > Perhaps something like this would work (untested)? > > Oops, here is the patch I wanted to attach: Can you make it a patch? :) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Marius Bakke
Marius Bakke writes: > Perhaps something like this would work (untested)? Oops, here is the patch I wanted to attach: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (define* (check #:key tests? test-target use-setuptools? #:allow-other-keys) "Run the test suite of a given P

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > I noticed while building the package added by ng0's patch (below) that > the test suite fails, but the check phase succeeds: > > [...] > == > ERROR: test_clone_with_credentials (test.test_repository.CloneRe

bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.]

2016-12-11 Thread Leo Famulari
I noticed while building the package added by ng0's patch (below) that the test suite fails, but the check phase succeeds: [...] == ERROR: test_clone_with_credentials (test.test_repository.CloneRepositoryTest)