bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2019-02-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello sirgazil, sirgazil skribis: > This issue is solved in the website repository now. The following > commits fix remaining validation errors related to the use of the > obsolete TT element: > > * 13a1a5a41df9eae7d3ca54c6ab4774c7804dba45 > >

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2019-02-08 Thread sirgazil
Fixed. Changes published. -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2019-02-06 Thread sirgazil
Hi, This issue is solved in the website repository now. The following commits fix remaining validation errors related to the use of the obsolete TT element: * 13a1a5a41df9eae7d3ca54c6ab4774c7804dba45

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2017-12-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
sirgazil skribis: > On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hello, >> >> sirgazil skribis: >> >>> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, >>> except for the Packages page, which has a tag for no opened P >>> element in every package description, >> >> Oh, how’s tha

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2017-12-09 Thread sirgazil
On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello, sirgazil skribis: With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, except for the Packages page, which has a tag for no opened P element in every package description, Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2017-12-07 Thread sirgazil
On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello, sirgazil skribis: With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, except for the Packages page, which has a tag for no opened P element in every package description, Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2017-12-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, sirgazil skribis: > With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, > except for the Packages page, which has a tag for no opened P > element in every package description, Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’? > and uses obsolete TT element in links t

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2017-12-06 Thread sirgazil
With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, except for the Packages page, which has a tag for no opened P element in every package description, and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches. https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnu.org%2Fsoftware%2Fguix%2F

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2016-11-24 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: > On 2016-11-23 16:45, l...@gnu.org wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: >> >>> There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in >>> the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or >>> attributes, and mi

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2016-11-23 Thread Luis Felipe López Acevedo
On 2016-11-23 16:45, l...@gnu.org wrote: Hello! Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or attributes, and missing closing tags. This is underway too, right? Yes.

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2016-11-23 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: > Steps to reproduce > == > > 1. Go to https://validator.w3.org/ > 2. For each page in the website: validate by URI > > > Unexpected behavior > === > > All pages are marked as [Invalid] Oops. > Most of the errors happen

bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test

2016-11-21 Thread Luis Felipe López Acevedo
Steps to reproduce == 1. Go to https://validator.w3.org/ 2. For each page in the website: validate by URI Unexpected behavior === All pages are marked as [Invalid] Expected behavior = All pages are marked as valid HTML 5 (Document checking com