bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

That's OK, I'm sending a patch in guix-devel mailing list now. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis: > I was thinking of editing the current recipe so as to get the package > from their current repository commit. What do you think? Should we do as > I said just now, or should we do as you suggested? I prefer to minimize changes compared to upstream’s release. So

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

I sent another patch to fix my typos in the Makefile and typo in a Scheme script, made by someone else, see: . signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

I was thinking of editing the current recipe so as to get the package from their current repository commit. What do you think? Should we do as I said just now, or should we do as you suggested? There's still one patch that I made for Artanis, that is supposed to correct a mistake I did in the Make

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

Hi, Adonay Felipe Nogueira skribis: > I have sent a patch that tries to fix the issue. > > See: Nice! Could you turn it into a patch for Guix? Essentially we would add the upstream patch to the ‘patches’ field of our Artanis package. Thanks, Lu

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

I have sent a patch that tries to fix the issue. See: -- # pt-BR: Brasileiro | en: Brazilian * pt-BR: Palestra sobre liberdade de software (movimento filosófico político-social, não tecnológico). * en: Gives talks about software freedom (philo

bug#23633: artanis package installation broken

The artanis package creates a broken directory hierarchy like this: /gnu/store/3090pddgmcqb989jwa7888nsvpcfkzqz-artanis-0.1.2 ├── etc │   ├── artanis │   │   ├── 205.html │   │   ├── 301.html │   │   ├── 400.html │   │   ├── 401.html │   │   ├── 403.html │   │   ├── 404.html │   │   ├── 405.html │