Done in 009b53f (current ‘core-updates’.)
Ludo’.
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Thu 17 Dec 2015 22:43, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo skribis:
>>
>>> We should be using C_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH, to mark system
>>> headers as system headers. Except that C_INCLUDE_PATH only works for
>>> C, so we need to also set CPLUS_
Thank you for thinking about this :)
On Thu 17 Dec 2015 22:43, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
>> We should be using C_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH, to mark system
>> headers as system headers. Except that C_INCLUDE_PATH only works for
>> C, so we need to also se
Andy Wingo skribis:
> So! CPATH is like -I but C_INCLUDE_PATH et al are like -isystem.
> Here's the docs for -isystem ("Preprocessor Options"):
>
> '-isystem DIR'
> Search DIR for header files, after all directories specified by
> '-I' but before the standard system directo
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> Are there other ones that could be set? Every time I compile it I see options
> for java and go.
GCJ honors ‘CLASSPATH’ (see gcc/java/jcf-path.c in the GCC tree), but
the Go front-end doesn’t seem to have anything similar.
Ludo’.
On Wed 16 Dec 2015 20:18, Efraim Flashner writes:
>> We should be using C_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH, to mark system
>> headers as system headers. Except that C_INCLUDE_PATH only works for
>> C, so we need to also set CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH and OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH.
>> And that's the proposal of thi
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:41:11 +
Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building GDB from git, because I want to hack on GDB. I have a few
> build-related things in my profile, including GCC. I enter an
> environment for GDB like this:
>
> guix environment gdb --ad-hoc flex autoconf-2.64
>
> C
Hi,
I am building GDB from git, because I want to hack on GDB. I have a few
build-related things in my profile, including GCC. I enter an
environment for GDB like this:
guix environment gdb --ad-hoc flex autoconf-2.64
Cool. Very good. I build:
mkdir +2.0
cd +2.0
../configure --prefi
