On 2016-12-18 16:51, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
On 2016-12-18 05:14, l...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
Should we just list packages with actual issues? Or should we add
those
links?
For now, I'd remove the packages without issues. This would help
reduce the size of
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
> On 2016-12-18 05:14, l...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
>> Should we just list packages with actual issues? Or should we add
>> those
>> links?
>
>
> For now, I'd remove the packages without issues. This would help
> reduce the size of the page, which is almost 2 Mi
On 2016-12-18 05:14, l...@gnu.org wrote:
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
This bug is fixed in the website now:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
It really looks nicer this way, thank you!
Initially the reason to include all the packages on this page (not just
those
Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis:
> This bug is fixed in the website now:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
It really looks nicer this way, thank you!
Initially the reason to include all the packages on this page (not just
those having issues) was that we could have li
Fixed.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
This bug is fixed in the website now:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
