Andreas Enge skribis:
> Now, pseudo-upgrades are reported as downgrades. Namely, when the version
> number of a package does not increase, but something changes with respect
> to its inputs. I would suggest to treat them as upgrades.
Indeed. Fixed in 3bea13b, thanks!
Ludo’.
Now, pseudo-upgrades are reported as downgrades. Namely, when the version
number of a package does not increase, but something changes with respect
to its inputs. I would suggest to treat them as upgrades.
Andreas
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
> command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
> console output. It _always_ says it's upgrading them.
>From a quick check, ‘manifest-transaction-effects’ reports the right
thin
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
> as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
Fixed in 46b23e1:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ ./pre-inst-env guix package -p foo -i guile-1.8.8 -n
gnu/packages/gui
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
> as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
I don't know about this one, but another problem with our upgrade
command is that it mishandles outputs other than "out", at least in the
console output. It
As seen during a ‘guix package’ demo at FOSDEM, downgrades are reported
as upgrades as of 0.8.1.
Ludo’.
