On Jul 19, 2013, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> What do you mean by “multiple GBs of builds per week”? Linux{,-Libre}
> releases are not that frequent, are they?
They are. ATM there are 4 active stable releases that each get one new
release per week. There are 3 other LTS stable branc
On Jul 12, 2013, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Since we’re about to release a new version of Guix, I’d rather keep
> using 3.3.8.
> Alexandre: could you reinstate the original
> http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/3.3.8-gnu/linux-libre-3.3.8-gnu.tar.xz?
I suppose you
On Jul 19, 2013, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 schrieb Alexandre Oliva:
>> However, considering we put out multiple GBs of builds per
>> week, I don't think it's realistic to keep them all forever. Not in our
>> own server, not at ftp.gnu.org.
> As far as I know, ftp.gnu.org w
Alexandre Oliva skribis:
> On Jul 19, 2013, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> What do you mean by “multiple GBs of builds per week”? Linux{,-Libre}
>> releases are not that frequent, are they?
>
> They are. ATM there are 4 active stable releases that each get one new
> release per week
Am Freitag, 19. Juli 2013 schrieb Alexandre Oliva:
> However, considering we put out multiple GBs of builds per
> week, I don't think it's realistic to keep them all forever. Not in our
> own server, not at ftp.gnu.org.
As far as I know, ftp.gnu.org would only be concerned with the source, that
Alexandre Oliva skribis:
> On Jul 12, 2013, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Since we’re about to release a new version of Guix, I’d rather keep
>> using 3.3.8.
>
>> Alexandre: could you reinstate the original
>> http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/3.3.8-gnu/linux-libr
I’ve asked ftp-upload@ if they could allow me to upload linux-libre
tarballs to ftp.gnu.org.
In the meantime, I’ve uploaded this tarball to
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/mirror and changed linux.scm to refer to it.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
My understanding is that the change from gnu to gnu1 is the result of
changes that were needed to the deblobbing. Specifically to allow the
loading of the firmware used by ath9k-htc, now that it's free [0]...
i.e. 3.3.8-gnu and 3.3.8-gnu1 aren't the same source code.
[0]
https://www.fsf.org/news/r
"Jason Self" skribis:
> My understanding is that the change from gnu to gnu1 is the result of
> changes that were needed to the deblobbing. Specifically to allow the
> loading of the firmware used by ath9k-htc, now that it's free [0]...
> i.e. 3.3.8-gnu and 3.3.8-gnu1 aren't the same source code.
Hello,
(Cc: Alexandre Oliva of Linux-Libre.)
Andreas Enge skribis:
> The build of linux-libre-headers-3.3.8 currently fails because the tarball
> cannot be downloaded any more from
>http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/3.3.8-gnu/
> Instead, there is a new version in
>h
The build of linux-libre-headers-3.3.8 currently fails because the tarball
cannot be downloaded any more from
http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/3.3.8-gnu/
Instead, there is a new version in
http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/3.3.8-gnu1/
Should we switc
11 matches
Mail list logo
