Andreas Enge skribis:
> "On many systems, such as Mac OS X and Red Hat Linux, csh is actually tcsh,
> an improved version of csh. One file containing the tcsh executable has
> links to it as both "csh" and "tcsh" so that either name refers to the same
> improved version of the C shell.
> On De
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
> We could do that, since tcsh is fully compatible with csh, but shouldn't
> we rather package csh as well ? The "csh" package in Debian uses sources
> from the OpenBSD CVS repository, so we'd need a cvs-fetch method.
My impression was that th
On 02/07/2013 10:29 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello,
does tcsh include a csh binary? If not, would it make sense to add a
symbolic link? I have seen the patch-shebangs phase complain about a
missing csh interpreter (apparently without any incidence, since the tests
pass, but it would nevertheless
Hello,
does tcsh include a csh binary? If not, would it make sense to add a
symbolic link? I have seen the patch-shebangs phase complain about a
missing csh interpreter (apparently without any incidence, since the tests
pass, but it would nevertheless be nice to patch correctly).
Andreas
* gnu/packages/tcsh.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/tcsh-fix-autotest.patch: New file
* Makefile.am: Add them.
---
Makefile.am |2 +
gnu/packages/patches/tcsh-fix-autotest.patch | 231 ++
gnu/packages/tcsh.scm
