On 03/26/2013 11:40 PM, Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
+ "The OpenJPEG library is an open-source JPEG 2000 codec written
in C
I suggest to replace "open-source" with "free software." If you think
that it's not ethical to replace (it's possible that OpenJPEG people
don't care about freedom-relat
On 03/27/2013 09:47 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
Am Dienstag, 26. März 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
gnu/packages/libopenjpeg.scm | 56
There is already a file libjpeg.scm. How about putting the packages in the
same file, named jpeg.scm, for instance?
This file does not exist on the 'master' b
Am Dienstag, 26. März 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
> gnu/packages/libopenjpeg.scm | 56
There is already a file libjpeg.scm. How about putting the packages in the
same file, named jpeg.scm, for instance?
Andreas
Am Dienstag, 26. März 2013 schrieb Nikita Karetnikov:
> I suggest to replace "open-source" with "free software."
I do it all the time, I think we do not want to mention "open source" in
guix...
> The OpenJPEG library is a JPEG 2000 codec written...
... and this is often better, I would say, sin
> + "The OpenJPEG library is an open-source JPEG 2000 codec written
> in C
I suggest to replace "open-source" with "free software." If you think
that it's not ethical to replace (it's possible that OpenJPEG people
don't care about freedom-related issues), you can just remove it.
For example
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> This is quite a dummy commit: the tests are disabled because they fail. This
> package is not ready to be pushed, but it allows us to try the new cmake build
> system.
Better investigate the failure, of course, but it’s OK to push it
before, if you prefer.
> + #:use-m
This is quite a dummy commit: the tests are disabled because they fail. This
package is not ready to be pushed, but it allows us to try the new cmake build
system.
* gnu/packages/libopenjpeg.scm: New file.
* Makefile.am: Add it.
---
Makefile.am |1 +
gnu/packages/libopenjpeg.
