Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Alternately, you could move the ‘check’ phase after the install phase,
>> like this (untested):
>
> But then, if the check fails, the /nix/store would contain an "invalid"
> package, no?
No: if ‘check’ fails (or ‘ins
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Alternately, you could move the ‘check’ phase after the install phase,
> like this (untested):
But then, if the check fails, the /nix/store would contain an "invalid"
package, no? I think it would be desirable to install only packages for
whi
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
[...]
>> Finally, a bunch of tests fail, and some of them cannot even be
>> launched:
>> "/nix/store/wqvmn0mmk68iwy88ljgqn57vjf15nf74-ocaml-4.00.1/bin/ocamlrun:
>> bad interpreter: No such file or directory"
>>
>> This
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 schrieb Cyril Roelandt:
> "patch-shebang: ./otherlibs/labltk/examples_labltk/hello.tcl: warning:
> no binary for interpreter `wish' found in $PATH"
>
> wish is provided by tk, and seems to require X, so I don't think it's
> too bad.
Hopefully, this is detected during co
* gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: New file.
* Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
* guix/licenses.scm: New variable.
---
Hey !
This patch is a first attempt at packaging OCaml. I'm getting a few
error messages when building:
"patch-shebang: ./otherlibs/labltk/examples_labltk/hello.tcl: warning: no
binary for
