Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog.

2013-02-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nikita Karetnikov skribis: > From 31d58fb07a91fe7a37b55517647b222ec146fcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Nikita Karetnikov > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:11:29 + > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog. > > * gnu/packages/gprolog.scm: New file. > * Makefile.am (MODULES)

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog.

2013-02-01 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
What about this one? From 31d58fb07a91fe7a37b55517647b222ec146fcf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikita Karetnikov Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:11:29 + Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog. * gnu/packages/gprolog.scm: New file. * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it. --- Makefile.am

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog. (was: GNU Prolog: configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub)

2013-01-31 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2013 schrieb Nikita Karetnikov: > This patch works, but I'd like to simplify it a bit. Is it possible? There is no need to repeat the phases that do not change in your patch. If you have a look at icu4c.scm, there is an example using "alist-replace" for the configure p

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog.

2013-01-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Nikita Karetnikov skribis: > +(arguments `(#:phases (alist-cons-before > + 'configure 'fix-sh > + (lambda _ > + (substitute* "./src/configure" > + (("-/bin/sh") > +

[PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog. (was: GNU Prolog: configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub)

2013-01-30 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
This patch works, but I'd like to simplify it a bit. Is it possible? Nikita From 906e8bd6fe66e330e090ee6c2176a2d5bebdd7fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikita Karetnikov Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:01:32 + Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add GNU Prolog. * gnu/packages/gprolog.scm: New