On 02/06/2013 03:17 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
When using (which "sh"), 2 tests fail with the following error:
/nix/store/4mg8b8vvmava68y64qmm70gqfnhhjzmx-bash-4.2/nix/store/4mg8b8vvmava68y64qmm70gqfnhhjzmx-bash-4.2/bin/sh:
Command not found
Any idea ?
Presumably th
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> When using (which "sh"), 2 tests fail with the following error:
>
> /nix/store/4mg8b8vvmava68y64qmm70gqfnhhjzmx-bash-4.2/nix/store/4mg8b8vvmava68y64qmm70gqfnhhjzmx-bash-4.2/bin/sh:
> Command not found
>
> Any idea ?
Presumably there’s double-patching occurring.
That is
On 02/04/2013 11:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
[...]
+;; The .at files create shell scripts without shebangs. Erk.
+(substitute* "tests/commands.at"
+ (("./output.sh")
+ (string-append (which "b
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 02/04/2013 11:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Cyril Roelandt skribis:
>>
>>> This patch adds tcsh. It was a bit hard to make the testsuite work: I
>>> disabled a
>>> few tests that I could not get working during the "check" phase, but it
>>> should
>>> not be a pr
On 02/04/2013 11:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
This patch adds tcsh. It was a bit hard to make the testsuite work: I disabled a
few tests that I could not get working during the "check" phase, but it should
not be a problem, since they work fine with the installed binar
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> This patch adds tcsh. It was a bit hard to make the testsuite work: I
> disabled a
> few tests that I could not get working during the "check" phase, but it should
> not be a problem, since they work fine with the installed binary.
Good!
> +(inputs
> + `(("aut
* gnu/packages/tcsh.scm: New file.
* gnu/packages/patches/tcsh-fix-autotest.patch: New file
* Makefile.am: Add them.
---
Hey !
This patch adds tcsh. It was a bit hard to make the testsuite work: I disabled a
few tests that I could not get working during the "check" phase, but it should
not be a pr
