On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 2:25 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 04:53:57 +0800,
> Motiejus Jakštys wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 5:20 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
> > > Thanks! Then I'll keep abilists removed before we can reprod
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 5:20 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
> Thanks! Then I'll keep abilists removed before we can reproduce one :)
OK here it is for 0.11:
1. check out glibc-abi-tool 13576b1ea957882be7ff2c99f4cdc27454930219
2. rm -fr glibc/2.3{5,6,7,8}
3. apply the attached patch.
4. /path/to/zig-0.1
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 5:20 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:41:10 +0800,
> Motiejus Jakštys wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 1:08 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
> > >
> > > <...> together with the concern on generated files.
> &g
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:12 PM Motiejus Jakštys wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 5:20 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
> > Thanks! Then I'll keep abilists removed before we can reproduce one :)
Ahh, now I realized you probably meant removed in 0.11. Sorry for the noise!
Motiejus
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 1:08 PM Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> <...> together with the concern on generated files.
Hi Hilton,
The only remaining, to my knowledge, binary file is `abilists`, which,
once you have `zig` binary, can be generated this way:
git clone https://github.com/ziglang/glibc-abi-too
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 8:55 AM Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:30:40 +0800,
> Hilton Chain wrote:
> >
> > Also for reproducibility, bin/zig is the only file differs and here's the
> > diff,
> > I don't know about this part so I currently have no idea on fixing it.
>
> This seem to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:22 AM Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:05:52 +0800,
> Hilton Chain wrote:
> I also have concern for Zig's relying on /usr/bin/env (Zig uses an ELF file to
> find dynamic linker, env is chosen for it's well-known). We have patched this
> reference, not sure
