Hello Maxim,
> I'm guessing it's simply getting a bit dated? In my experience, as soon
> as you fall one on a few stable releases behind, you start experimenting
> more problems. I'm not sure if Jami is supposed to be backward
> compatible with previous versions, but even if it was, it's probabl
Hello again Giovanni,
I’ll just go ahead and CC some old developers from Guix who were initially part
of bringing Jami to Guix. Found them by searching down the mailing list[0].
Hopefully y’all can guide us a bit with regards to where things are going wrong.
[0]: https://yhetil.org/guix/?q=ma
Sorry Ludo, I mistyped the bug number when sending the patches. They are
supposed to be sent to #76232.
Apologies. If there's a way of deleting the last two patches from this issue,
please do so.
Regards,
On 12 February 2025 17:27:00 GMT, Divya Ranjan wrote:
>* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-io
* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-aporetic): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm
index 16ab0af70e..50a51d8289 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm
* gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-iosevka-comfy): Delete variable.
---
gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm b/gnu/packages/fonts.scm
index c32f2ef5fb..16ab0af70e 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/fonts.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/fon
