Hello,
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> https://finestructure.net/assword/
>>
>> The assword password management system project as been renamed "impass",
>> and has moved to https://salsa.debian.org/debian/impass.
>>
>> Someone™ who uses this package should update
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 08:56:33PM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> I was about to write this; thanks for be6g faster :-). I believe the
> unpacking should now be fine even for i686, Leo?
Yes, it's working now! Fantastic!
Marco Fortina skribis:
> I have this issue when with guix time-machine shell when using --emulate-fhs
> option and having gcc-toolset and clang-toolset in my manifest.scm.
This was fixed in 23ab6fc29f28b0fa9ad94bf2ceed135ee3fdea34, based on the
patch you sent.
Closing.
Ludo’.
Hi,
Dariqq skribis:
> * gnu/home/services/desktop.scm (home-dbus-shepherd-services): Log to
> %user-log-dir.
> * gnu/home/services/desktop.scm (home-unclutter-shepherd-services): Same.
> * gnu/home/services/pm.scm (home-batsignal-shepherd-services): Same.
> * gnu/home/services/shepherd.scm (laun
Fixed with commit 9cdcfb52ace77fe3b497b21deb639a3027ff02f0
close #742923
Den sön 10 nov. 2024 kl 13:52 skrev GNU bug Tracking System
:
>
> Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers
close #74292
Den sön 10 nov. 2024 kl 13:52 skrev GNU bug Tracking System
:
>
> Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers a
Hi Ludo,
On 10.11.24 12:51, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Dariqq skribis:
When using guix home to manage shepherd services on a foreign
distribution the shepherd package is also added to the home-profile.
This then makes the home profile provide 'halt', 'shutdown' and
'reboot' (and their manpa
Hi,
I was looking at what Nix does, and they carry this patch, under
pkgs/development/libraries/gnutls/nix-ssl-cert-file.patch:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
allow overriding system trust store location via $NIX_SSL_CERT_FILE
--- a/lib/system/certs.c
+++ b/lib
That workaround worked in 2014, but now "libfuse" seems to search under
"/usr/bin" and not "/run/setuid-programs". The `DFUSERMOUNT_DIR` modification
doesn't seem to work anymore. I think to reproduce all what is needed is
`strace` with follow forks to see the software seeking "/usr/bin." And
p
-- Forwarded message -
Från: Luna Jernberg
Date: sön 10 nov. 2024 kl 09:16
Subject: shepherd-1.0.0rc1.sv.po
To: Translation Project Robot , Göran
Uddeborg , Benno Schulenberg
, Luna Jernberg
, Diskussioner om översättning till svenska
99% done
can someone help me to look at the
That workaround worked in 2014, but now "libfuse" seems to search under
"/usr/bin" and not "/run/setuid-programs". The `DFUSERMOUNT_DIR` modification
doesn't seem to work anymore. I think to reproduce all what is needed is
`strace` with follow forks to see the software seeking "/usr/bin." And
p
-- Forwarded message -
Från: Luna Jernberg
Date: sön 10 nov. 2024 kl 10:30
Subject: Re: shepherd-1.0.0rc1.sv.po
To: Göran Uddeborg
Cc: Benno Schulenberg ,
Diskussioner om översättning till svenska
Tack för hjälpen/thanks for the help
have sent the robot a correct translation n
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 at 12:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> $ guix shell -m manifest.scm --export-manifest
>
> ‘--export-manifest’ is meant to “translate” a command line, which it can
> do faithfully; there’s no way it could possibly “recreate” what
> ‘manifest.scm’, which may contain arbitrary
Efraim Flashner writes:
Hello,
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:21:57PM -0400, Richard Sent wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > People have presented some good reasons for keeping at least some level
>> > of i686 support.
>> >
>> > But unfortunately, 3rd party channels cannot be one of them, wh
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi,
> skribis:
>
Anyway, using this patch 0001 it seems that suppressing the warnings
works, I no longer get
"GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 112
KiB):\n\tMay lead to memory leak and poor performance\n"
>>
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 02:51:49PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>> For a long time we've not been able to build linux-libre on i686-linux
>>> because the source unpacking process runs out of memory.
>>
>> I believe if we limit the unpac
Hello,
skribis:
>>> Anyway, using this patch 0001 it seems that suppressing the warnings
>>> works, I no longer get
>>>
>>> "GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 112
>>> KiB):\n\tMay lead to memory leak and poor performance\n"
>>>
>>>
>>> but still get
>>>
>>> unexpect
Hi,
Dariqq skribis:
> When using guix home to manage shepherd services on a foreign
> distribution the shepherd package is also added to the home-profile.
>
> This then makes the home profile provide 'halt', 'shutdown' and
> 'reboot' (and their manpages) masking the system ones.
Oh, indeed. I’
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> Cuirass stores GC roots for all the derivations of its jobsets under
> /var/guix/profiles/per-user/cuirass/cuirass (or similar).
>
> The ‘delete-old-gc-roots’ periodically deletes these GC roots (which are
> not just derivations), but it’s supposed to keep GC roots to d
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> There's a common pattern in packages where the validate-runpath phases
> fail, which is when a binary is linked to libraries provided by the same
> package. In this case, our ld-wrapper script appears to not bake the
> required runpath, which then fails the valida
Hi,
Simon Tournier skribis:
> $ guix shell -m manifest.scm --export-manifest
‘--export-manifest’ is meant to “translate” a command line, which it can
do faithfully; there’s no way it could possibly “recreate” what
‘manifest.scm’, which may contain arbitrary Scheme code (and someone who
already
On 2024-11-10 11:58, Saku Laesvuori wrote:
>
> I do agree that it seems more convenient to run `guix shell --allow`
> than copy a rather long line from the hint and run it to append a line
> to shell-authorized-directories.
>
> Authorizing files instead of directories does not seem that great of a
Hi Tomas,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> (start #~(lambda _
>(let* ((cmd "/run/privileged/bin/ping -qc1 -W1 1.1.1.1")
> (status (system cmd)))
> (= 0 (status:exit-val status)
> (one-shot? #t)
> ;
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Nicolas Graves wrote:
> On 2024-09-11 16:11, Nicolas Graves wrote:
>
> >> That option would add a line to ‘shell-autorized-directories’?
> >
> > Yes. Actually I would like to develop a little more after thinking about
> > that.
> >
> > Let's say you git pu
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 23:25, Hilton Chain via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> wrote:
>
>>> I can confirm the reproducibility issue.
>>>
>>> I have two x86_64-linux machines building guix to verify the fix, I'll apply
>>> your patch once they produce match
26 matches
Mail list logo
