bug#38439: No way for Retroarch users to install cores & assets via Guix

2024-10-06 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Tobias, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > Guix, > > When starting our Retroarch package, it warns: ‘Missing assets, go get > some’. > > Unfortunately, there's no way to do so through Guix apart from > manually searching for the required core(s) & assets and downloading > them to the right locat

bug#73645: Unable to update system due to lsof build failing on ffmpegthumbnailer and pam-mount

2024-10-06 Thread not emma via Bug reports for GNU Guix
hi, thank you for getting back on this. it likely is related to the upstream issue, and i'd be good on closing this out Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Sunday, October 6th, 2024 at 9:29 AM, Z572 wrote: > not emma via Bug reports for GNU Guix bug-guix@gnu.org writes: > > > it seems l

bug#73659: Skia check phase fails on aarch64

2024-10-06 Thread Brennan Vincent
start gl gm strokes_zoomed LLVM ERROR: Instruction Combining did not reach a fixpoint after 1 iterations Caught signal 6 [Aborted] (992MB RAM, peak 1042MB), was running: Caught signal 6 [Aborted] (992MB RAM, peak 1042MB), was running: gl gm strokes_zoomed gl gm strokes_zoomed L

bug#73432: clojure package is broken

2024-10-06 Thread Rostislav Svoboda
Hi. The bug can be tested with a one liner from within the guix shell of your guix-repo checkout directory. Then it's just a git bisect grind resulting in: bad commit:6a763d916e 2023-02-25 (HEAD) gnu: maven: Update to 3.9.0. Julien Lepiller compile error: 7634bfca4a 2023-02-25 gnu: Add java-as

bug#71967: Issue can be closed.

2024-10-06 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hmmm, never mind. You did. My client was hiding that fact for some reason. I suspect it hates me. Kind regards, T G-R

bug#71967: Issue can be closed.

2024-10-06 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi, Done, but next time, you can close it yourself by changing the address from 71...@debbugs.gnu.org to 71967-d...@debbugs.gnu.org before you reply. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

bug#71967: Issue can be closed.

2024-10-06 Thread Apoorv via Bug reports for GNU Guix
I don't have any issues with this package anymore, so I guess this can be closed. -- Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-free emails: https://tuta.com

bug#73645: Unable to update system due to lsof build failing on ffmpegthumbnailer and pam-mount

2024-10-06 Thread Z572
not emma via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > it seems like lsof is failing the check​ phase after running guix pull​ > earlier today, leaving me unable to update either the system > or home profile. the following output was from the logs: > > phase `build' succeeded after 1.9 seconds > starti

bug#68611: Issue can be closed.

2024-10-06 Thread Apoorv via Bug reports for GNU Guix
The following issue can be closed now as the package build and runs fine now. -- Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-free emails: https://tuta.com

bug#66818: linux-libre-6.5.9 doesn't exist anymore.

2024-10-06 Thread Apoorv Singh
linux-libre-6.5.9 kernel doesn't exist anymore in the guix channel so the issue can be closed now as its irrelevant now. -- - Apoorv Singh - Sent from Emacs.

bug#73304: Python in relocatable guix pack leads to wrong sys.path

2024-10-06 Thread Konrad Hinsen
Konrad Hinsen writes: > I have changed my mind. In the sys.path outputs shown, there are no > paths from add-on packages. It's just the Python standard library. > Maybe our sitecustomize.py is not run at all, but if it is, it didn't do > anything to sys.path. There must be a bug somewhere else.