bug#40316: core-updates nss not reproducible

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
retitle 40316 nss not reproducible thanks Still an issue on master as of d29e5a83e887cd2f4f459a12cbbfc40c77e55ce2: guix challenge --verbose --diff=simple nss guix challenge: warning: could not determine current substitute URLs; using defaults /gnu/store/mc9gdsm0cqpyd2522f5xghdl59p1l35r-nss-3.88.

bug#44835: gnu/ci.go: Embeds build path, breaking reproducible builds

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-12-03, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > >>> … but I don’t think we can assume that the checkout is in the >>> ‘%load-path’ when this code is executed. WDYT, Mathieu? >> >> Cuirass happens to add checkouts to the %load-path just before loading >> this file. > > Is that

bug#44097: Gnucash not reproducible

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Well, with a fairly recent guix: Generation 78 Mar 07 2024 12:51:33(current) guix d29e5a8 repository URL: /home/vagrant/src/guix branch: master commit: d29e5a83e887cd2f4f459a12cbbfc40c77e55ce2 gnucash 5.5 is now still not reproducible, but apparently for a possibly different r

bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-03-07, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-02-20, Andrew Tropin wrote: >> guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different >> machines. >> >> I executed the same command on a few different machines. >> channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specifie

bug#68748: cuirass is not reproducible

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-01-26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> Building cuirass with 'guix build --no-grafts --check -K cuirass' shows >> it has differences. Then running > > I think this is not particular to cuirass but more to any Guile package. > I've found similar issues with guile-git an

bug#69284: guix pull is not reproducible

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-02-20, Andrew Tropin wrote: > guix pull -C channels-lock.scm produces different profiles on different > machines. > > I executed the same command on a few different machines. > channels-lock.scm contains channels list with exact commit specified. > > --8<---cut here-

bug#68764: ASDF can't load sbcl-clx-truetype installed through Guix

2024-03-07 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
Lars Rustand skribis: > I had forgot about this thread, but randomly saw it mentioned on IRC > today. The problem in my case was that I had some packages in > ~/common-lisp. Since I was running the container from my home folder > this was still visible inside the container even though it was --pu

bug#67334: diffoscope: missing/undetected dependencies?

2024-03-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-11-21, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hi, recently I tried to use diffoscope to compare to PDFs. I got these errors: > > │┄ xxd not available in path. Falling back to Python hexlify. > │┄ 'pdftotext' not available in path. Falling back to binary comparison. > > I found that if I installed pack

bug#69617: guix go import fails on some version tags

2024-03-07 Thread Ryan Barber
In some cases the "guix import go" command fails when attempting to checkout the source for a module using a tag which does not exist in the repo. Upon further investigation, I have found guix/import/go.scm will use the version string as tag. While this works most of the time, some module vendors

bug#69599: peercred package crashes guix go importer

2024-03-07 Thread Nathan Dehnel
Is there a way to work around this for the recursive importer if another package uses the old domain? On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:59 PM Carlo Zancanaro wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 06 2024, Nathan Dehnel wrote: > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1683:16: In procedure raise-exception: > > In procedure getaddrinfo: Syst

bug#43779: tbb: test_global_control failure

2024-03-07 Thread Greg Hogan
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:48 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Greg Hogan skribis: > > > I am also successfully building tbb-2020.3 and octave-5.2.0 locally. Is it > > possible to retry the build on ci.guix.gnu.org? > > I retried and it succeeded this time: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/l

bug#69609: Missing Disarchive info for isl-0.19.tar.bz2

2024-03-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, We have an empty Disarchive spec here: https://disarchive.ngyro.com/sha256/d59726f34f7852a081fbd3defd1ab2136f174110fc2e0c8d10bb122173fa9ed8 https://disarchive.guix.gnu.org/sha256/d59726f34f7852a081fbd3defd1ab2136f174110fc2e0c8d10bb122173fa9ed8 This is for isl-0.19.tar.bz2, a depende