I installed Guix again on unencrypted partition and now it works. I guess I
forgot to add necessary kernel arguments at the previous unencrypted setup.
Encryption decreased system's performance significantly anyway...
You know the best about what to do with this issue. Thanks for your preciou
On 05-09-2022 10:21, zimoun wrote:
On sam., 03 sept. 2022 at 19:27, Maxime Devos wrote:
* if some but not all channels are available, and there is at least
one updated channel --> log the missing channels, and update the
channels that_are_ available (but don't 'ignore' the missi
On 05-09-2022 14:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I’d like to test whether UPower invokes the intended critical action,
but I’m not sure how to simulate a low battery level. Thoughts?
I've found a 'Virtual Battery Driver': https://lwn.net/Articles/440097/
The gmane links are dead, but the linux so
On 05-09-2022 15:06, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The main difficulty here is that, should we eventually decide to change
behaviors, we’ll have to devise a migration timeline etc. (As an
example, we chose to keep ‘guix environment’ until at least May 2023;
all this must take time if we want to avoid
Had some info from Guix Matrix channel:
> GDM does wayland too with the option set to #t. I was able to get it
to work going back from sddm, but I had to remove the home folder and
recreate it from scratch, since gnome session was crashing on login. I
had no problem starting gnome on a new acco
Hi Ludo,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:06 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your feedback on this.
>
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
> > So there are some competing expectations here. The status quo is that
> > non-interactive invocations of 'guix shell' will not load a guix.scm o
Hi,
Zhu Zihao skribis:
> I'm working with my private channel, And I update my gpg key using
> NIPT-P384 algorithm. But `guix time-machine` complains that:
[...]
> 226:4 6 (authenticate-commit # # …)
>129:23 5 (commit-signing-key _ # …)
> In guix/openpgp.scm:
>562:26 4 (verify-op
Hi,
On dim., 04 sept. 2022 at 17:18, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> srfi/srfi-1.scm:241:2: In procedure map:
> In procedure map: Wrong type argument: "https://www.qt.io/";
> building pages in '/tmp/gnu.org/software/guix'...
> Backtrace:
>2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/qr419pk9hdvg692rkhdlyv
Oops. I accidentally replied privately to d...@jpoiret.xyz, not
mentioning 57...@debbugs.gnu.org. I hope the history can be recovered
from this message.
Josselin recommended to
- check permissions on /tmp/.X11-unix/ (gdm user should have r+w
permissions)
shegeley@zone51 /tmp$ ls -lah .X
Jack, Yusuf, Ludo',
Yusuf: you could try pulling, reconfiguring, hibernating, and
resuming, if you're brave-ish.
Ludovic Courtès 写道：
I believe this is fixed by this: […] The patch in question fell
through the cracks
It should and it had, sorry.
I *dislike* the fact that this makes the resu
Hi David,
Thanks for your feedback on this.
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> So there are some competing expectations here. The status quo is that
> non-interactive invocations of 'guix shell' will not load a guix.scm or
> manifest.scm file unless explicitly told to via --file/--manifest following
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> One issue remains: UPower should have called elogind’s “PowerOff” method
> for ordered shutdown before total power outage, but either that didn’t
> happen or elogind didn’t do it right (which is weird, because ‘loginctl
> poweroff’ DTRT.)
I pushed these patches:
Quoting my own email I think this is the relevant bit. I don't think it's an
issue in haunt, but something with qt:
srfi/srfi-1.scm:241:2: In procedure map:
In procedure map: Wrong type argument: "https://www.qt.io/";
building pages in '/tmp/gnu.org/software/guix'...
Le 5 septembre 2022 14:04:10
Hi again,
Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道：
(and testing these kinds of features is
dangerous,
you could make a wrong move and incur heavy data loss)
I couldn't agree moEXT4-fs ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block
30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-
Hi,
Josselin Poiret skribis:
> Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
>
>> I haven't encountered this problem on any other distros. You probably
>> realized that I encrypted my disk. Hibernation wasn't working while I was
>> using Guix without encryption a few months ago either.
tcc currently builds successfully.
Closing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Yusuf, Ludo',
Josselin is right that resuming from encrypted swap isn't
supported.
Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix 写道：
Hibernation wasn't working
while I
was using Guix without encryption a few months ago eit
When running the derivation checker on all packages for recent guix
revisions, it dones't seem to complete. Instead, you get an error which
I think comes from the garbage collection implementation that Guile
uses:
→ guix lint --checkers=derivation
Too many heap sections: Increase MAXHINCR or M
Hi,
On lun., 05 sept. 2022 at 12:59, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>> $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes guix environment -C -m
>> manifest.scm \
>> -E LANG -E GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL --share=/tmp
>> \
>>
On lun., 05 sept. 2022 at 12:27, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I used guix build -f .guix.scm. I'm on the latest guix-artwork but an
> older guix from maybe a month ago. GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL doesn't build
> everything, only a subset of packages end up in the generated list. I
> think my issue is with qt
zimoun writes:
> $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes guix environment -C -m
> manifest.scm \
> -E LANG -E GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL --share=/tmp
> \
> -- haunt build
Yes but `guix build -f .guix.scm` fails for me too, perhaps because
I used guix build -f .guix.scm. I'm on the latest guix-artwork but an older
guix from maybe a month ago. GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL doesn't build everything, only
a subset of packages end up in the generated list. I think my issue is with qt,
which probably isn't part of that subset.
Le 5 septembre 20
Hey,
Just noticed that Racket does not build in a reproducible fashion:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix describe
Generation 227 Sep 04 2022 23:39:52(current)
guix aae98c2
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: mast
I tested building for armhf and aarch64 with Guix at
0898fd56c910cc76d8b59bbe781f1a05ab78fad6, and it worked fine.
Closing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Julien
On dim., 04 sept. 2022 at 17:18, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I tried to update the po files for the website today, but I was unable
> to test. Trying to build the website from a clean checkout (without
> updating translations) gives this error. I think it's related to the
> code that gene
Hi Maxime,
On sam., 03 sept. 2022 at 19:27, Maxime Devos wrote:
> * if some but not all channels are available, and there is at least
> one updated channel --> log the missing channels, and update the
> channels that _are_ available (but don't 'ignore' the missing
> channels by rem
Hi,
On dim., 04 sept. 2022 at 09:26, "Thompson, David"
wrote:
> Thanks! I made one minor tweak to sort the inputs list alphabetically
> and pushed as commit 1aa46a7e29c5bd892219fe20fefb883d2103e29e.
Cool!
> I also pushed a follow-up commit
> e4ccfcb22ad96e71ca4dfad95af5aa6229ed9869 that swaps
This has been fixed with commit
6b5ef03a2582ab23228478018fd356e17db1daea.
Closing.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
28 matches
Mail list logo
