qui 07 jul 2022 às 18:35:42 (1657229742), nan...@riseup.net enviou:
> I think this may be actually a bug upstream. (...)
I mean, we could change the submodule-update fetch-options to allow
for repository initialization when it's absent, but does it make
sense considering we would just remove it wh
I was playing around with this today, and it is awesome!
I think it should be merged, because it has already helped me with my opensmtpd
records project.
Thanks,
Joshua
Hello,
elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes:
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
>> Thank you for getting back to the bug. I am in the same situation in
>> that I use Guix System now. :D
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:20:28AM +0900, elaexuo...@wilsonb.com wrote:
>> > so you could be able to sanit
Hi!
ter 05 jul 2022 às 17:02:31 (1657051351), ludovic.cour...@inria.fr enviou:
> It seems that ‘update-cached-checkout’ fails to handle nested Git
> submodules, when a submodule itself has submodules:
I think this may be actually a bug upstream. When refreshing, guix is
able to recursively upgrad
Hello!
I wanted to serve public repositories from gitolite using git-daemon.
I tried the following configuration of services:
┌
│ (define git-daemon
│ (git-daemon-service
│#:config (git-daemon-configuration
│ (base-path "/var/lib/gitolite/repositories"
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> zimoun writes:
>
>> Bug#55499 [1] is fixed by 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e.
>> However, because the manifest version is going from 3 to 4 with new
>> fields, the new Guix cannot builds the old Guix.
>>
>> Commit 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e is n
zimoun writes:
> Bug#55499 [1] is fixed by 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e.
> However, because the manifest version is going from 3 to 4 with new
> fields, the new Guix cannot builds the old Guix.
>
> Commit 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e is not able to go to its
> parent 9b8
Hi,
Wiktor Zelazny writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 07:09:37AM +0200, wzela...@vurv.cz wrote:
>
>> Discovered by accident and did not explore further.
>
> ruby-nokogiri@1.10.9 to be exact. Did not check @1.12.5. Guix version
> 4d126e776239cc2e9b2e39718d0a1051f4a9bbc3.
I checked, and only 1.10.
Hi,
Bug#55499 [1] is fixed by 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e.
However, because the manifest version is going from 3 to 4 with new
fields, the new Guix cannot builds the old Guix.
Commit 4ff12d1de7cd617b791996ee7ca1240660b4c20e is not able to go to its
parent 9b8c442b254b82196fe2492142b3
Hi,
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hello Lily and Christian,
>
> This is unfortunately the usual gdk-pixbuf SVG loader not being found,
> since it is part of librsvg. Some details are described in [1] already,
> but to summarize: we need to propagate gdk-pixbuf so that the
> search-path GDK_PIXBUF_
Hi,
Alexandre Hannud Abdo writes:
> Le 04/07/2022 à 19:22, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit :
>> Note that NTFS != NFS. But to solve your problem, simply add ntfs-3g
>> to your operating-system's packages field.
>
> Ni! Hello
>
> "nfs" was a typo, sorry for that.
>
> True, I can add ntfs-3g, but g
Hi,
Gsettings-desktop-schemas is required by WebKitGTK to load HTTPS pages.
But it also depends on gnome-backgrounds which weights some 40 MiB.
For sure this does not help the closure size...
I suggest we create a separate output, or maybe a
gsettings-desktop-schemas-minimal which does not inclu
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> The ‘tests/services/telephony.scm’ file exercises procedures that were
> removed from (gnu build jami-service) in
> 85b4dabd94d53f8179f31a42046cd83fc3a352fc, which prevents ‘make check’
> from proceeding:
>
> $ make check -j5
>
> [...]
>
> PASS: tests/servic
Le 04/07/2022 à 19:22, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit :
Note that NTFS != NFS. But to solve your problem, simply add ntfs-3g
to your operating-system's packages field.
Ni! Hello
"nfs" was a typo, sorry for that.
True, I can add ntfs-3g, but given that I was able to mount the drive without
it
14 matches
Mail list logo
