bug#55158: bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8

2022-04-30 Thread Benjamin Slade
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 15:11:01 -0600 (39 minutes, 22 seconds ago), Maxime Devos wrote: > > Benjamin Slade schreef op wo 27-04-2022 om 18:22 [-0600]: > > The output of mu [ ] (and > > thus, > > by extension, mu4e in Emacs) does not correctly handle ch

bug#55200: Guix offload fails to resolve hostnames

2022-04-30 Thread Simon Streit
Hello! After a bit of bisecting I pinned my issue down to checkout 808b9e850491c7b1d867a5f1f4d5ee6f61f345d4. From there on any guix offload test or status will fail if a hostname, or FQDN, is set in the name field of a machine. Offloads work if an IP address is set instead. A snip: --8<

bug#55158: bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8

2022-04-30 Thread Maxime Devos
Benjamin Slade schreef op wo 27-04-2022 om 18:22 [-0600]: > The output of mu [ ] (and thus, > by extension, mu4e in Emacs) does not correctly handle characters outside of > a certain range (which confuses Emacs to no end). This behaviour occurs both

bug#55197: Build fail for `lightdm`

2022-04-30 Thread Pāladhammika via Bug reports for GNU Guix
https://termbin.com/dec5 All the best, Pāladhammika lightdm-bug Description: Binary data

bug#54786: Installation tests are failing

2022-04-30 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hey Ludo, > I pushed something along these lines as > 73afbb0765f76834b53c9fe6cf3c8f740840. Thanks for the fix! The jami and jami-provisioning tests are also broken because of what looks like to be the same issue: --8<---cut here---start->8--- One does n

bug#54723: [PATCH] Check URI when verifying narinfo validity.

2022-04-30 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hey Ludo, > Now, the only way ‘narinfo-string’ can take too long these days is (I > think) if the store GC lock is held (we should check that hypothesis, > but I believe that if the GC lock is held, then the ‘query-path-info’ > RPC made from ‘narinfo-string’ might block until the lock is release

bug#54723: [PATCH] Check URI when verifying narinfo validity.

2022-04-30 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> So in commit c1719a0adf3fa7611b56ca4d75b3ac8cf5c9c8ac I went ahead and >> reverted it that commit. I also added a test that reproduces the issue >> above. > > Commit 9eca13094d9bdf091f9096e0f3a8b450dac0e595 updates the ‘guix’ > package, s