bug#53790: Audacity has extraneous binary at directory root

2022-02-04 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi Leo, Am Freitag, dem 04.02.2022 um 17:03 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari: > Our Audacity package creates an extraneous "audacity" binary in the > root of the store item: > > -- > $ git describe   > v1.3.0-15695-gba60aede97 > $ ls -la $(./pre-inst-env guix build

bug#53621: i18n guix module error when opening shell after guix home reconfigure

2022-02-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Fixed in 41efa45508b292d947371dd6b9df943c33727c3d, thanks! Ludo’.

bug#53591: closed (Re: [PATCH] gnu: audacity: Add fallback to locate ffmpeg via pkg-config.)

2022-02-04 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:32:30PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Audacity still does not keep a reference to FFmpeg, and it cannot > Opus-encoded files (among many other types of encodings): On #guix, lilyp found the culprit: http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-02-04.log#235737 ... an extra "L" ch

bug#53591: closed (Re: [PATCH] gnu: audacity: Add fallback to locate ffmpeg via pkg-config.)

2022-02-04 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 07:19:02AM +, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > From: Liliana Marie Prikler > Am Samstag, dem 29.01.2022 um 14:53 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari: > > Well, this is fantastic Liliana! It works great. > > > > Can you add a comment to 'audacity-ffmpeg-fallback.patch' with a li

bug#53790: Audacity has extraneous binary at directory root

2022-02-04 Thread Leo Famulari
Our Audacity package creates an extraneous "audacity" binary in the root of the store item: -- $ git describe v1.3.0-15695-gba60aede97 $ ls -la $(./pre-inst-env guix build audacity) total 49012 dr-xr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Dec

bug#53258: Python unable to find modules within a Singularity container created with guix pack

2022-02-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ludovic Courtès skribis: >>From Marek’s message, it would seem that somewhere file names are > constructed by appending “..”. Given Unix’s weird dot-dot semantics, > relative symlinks could be interfering: Some news! Here’s a recap of the IRC discussion earlier today: ‘sys.prefix’ look

bug#53752: guix home symlink permissions

2022-02-04 Thread Zacchaeus Scheffer
> > > I finally migrated my home configuration to guix home. However, it > > seems guix home creates all symlinks with 777 permissions. This causes > > problems with openssh as it will not recognize my > > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys. It seems the directories have reasonable > > permissions (maybe be

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

2022-02-04 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 12:32:04AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > I'm still leaning towards something besides a change in the kernel. Using bisection of the Guix Git repo, it seems the problem was introduced in commit 2d12ec724ea2, "scripts: system: Rationalize persistency."

bug#53752: guix home symlink permissions

2022-02-04 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Donnerstag, dem 03.02.2022 um 13:08 -0500 schrieb Zacchaeus Scheffer: > I finally migrated my home configuration to guix home.  However, it > seems guix home creates all symlinks with 777 permissions.  This causes > problems with openssh as it will not recognize my > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys.  It

bug#53463: ci.guix.gnu.org not building the 'guix' job

2022-02-04 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hey, > Oh! That indicates that it’s failing to offload to one of the > ‘localhost’ build machines specified in /etc/guix/machines.scm. > Normally there’s an SSH tunnel set up for those, but I guess it broke. > > Perhaps we can update /etc/guix/machines.scm to refer to armhf-linux > machines by

bug#53463: ci.guix.gnu.org not building the 'guix' job

2022-02-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > I tried to strace one of the stuck evaluation process, it returns > repeatedly: > > [pid 36294] read(227, "gmlo\0\0\0\0J\0\0\0\0\0\0\0guix offload: error: failed > to connect to 'localhost': Connection refused\n\0\0\0\0\0\0", 65536) = 96 > [pid 36294] write(23