bug#41413: guix-install.sh broken on Gentoo

2020-05-19 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hullo, ZC via web 写道: guix-install.sh calls "update-rc.d", which doesn't exist on a Gentoo system. Instead of trying to support all possible init systems, or make assumptions regarding how the init system works, I'd suggest simply dropping support for anything other than upstart and/or system

bug#41213: boost-for-mysql fails to build

2020-05-19 Thread Jonathan Brielmaier
`tools/build/src/engine/execunix.cpp` was named `tools/build/src/engine/execunix.c` before. So the following patch allows to build boost@1.59 again. ``` diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm index 2f2ca289ab..d44b534939 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/

bug#41413: guix-install.sh broken on Gentoo

2020-05-19 Thread ZC via web
guix-install.sh calls "update-rc.d", which doesn't exist on a Gentoo system. Instead of trying to support all possible init systems, or make assumptions regarding how the init system works, I'd suggest simply dropping support for anything other than upstart and/or systemd. Users of smaller distr

bug#41413: guix-install.sh broken on Gentoo

2020-05-19 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Take it away, ZombieChicken: signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#41409: “guix pull” should show a progress bar for channel updates

2020-05-19 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
When I run “guix pull” (or “guix time-machine”) I see this message Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... followed by disconcerting silence. I can’t tell if it’s doing something, nor can I see what the progress is. Would be nice to have

bug#22883: Authenticating a Git checkout

2020-05-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ludovic Courtès skribis: > The list of authorized committers is meant to be stored in a > ‘.guix-authorizations’ file in each branch of the channel. It is > essentially a list of fingerprints: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=wip-openpgp&id=f145a2d1a982cc841c

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Leo, > Then your patch works! ok! Pushed to guix master as commit f523eaba7b5460937a230a824550243d75e5f1dc. pgpa1ubZ540cv.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:32:34PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:25:23 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > guix gc --references > > Doesn't contain go. Then your patch works! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 19 mai 2020 14:32:34 GMT-04:00, Danny Milosavljevic a écrit : >On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:25:23 -0400 >Leo Famulari wrote: > >> guix gc --references > >Doesn't contain go. You can try guix graph -t references --path /gnu/store/…-docker /gnu/store/…-go That should tell you which package referenc

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:25:23 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > guix gc --references Doesn't contain go. pgp7v_m9BPpka.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:16:41PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Leo, > > the patch below makes the grep return nothing, but guix size still contains > go. What about `guix gc --references /gnu/store/...-docker`? > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/docker.scm b/gnu/packages/docker.scm > ind

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Leo, the patch below makes the grep return nothing, but guix size still contains go. diff --git a/gnu/packages/docker.scm b/gnu/packages/docker.scm index c95ca3f9d7..bf009a792b 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/docker.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/docker.scm @@ -544,7 +544,9 @@ built-in registry server of Do

bug#41387: "Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with NO guix?

2020-05-19 Thread Bengt Richter
Hi Julien, On +2020-05-19 08:03:37 -0400, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le 18 mai 2020 23:07:42 GMT-04:00, Bengt Richter a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ ./configure --prefix=$(realpath ./mybuild) > >checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > >checking whether build

bug#41396: java-kafka-clients fails tests

2020-05-19 Thread Marius Bakke
merge 41396 40718 thanks Ricardo Wurmus writes: > java-kafka-clients has a failing test: > > [junit] Running org.apache.kafka.common.network.SslTransportLayerTest > [junit] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder". > [junit] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (N

bug#41344: Font broken in GUI application with guix pack

2020-05-19 Thread Marius Bakke
Alexandros Theodotou writes: > Hi, > > This is the command I ran to generate a pack: > guix pack -RR -S /opt/zrythm/bin=bin -L . zrythm > > I then tried moving this pack to a VM running another distro > (archlinux) and all letters are shown as boxes. I have asked other > people to test it on othe

bug#41344: Font broken in GUI application with guix pack

2020-05-19 Thread Alexandros Theodotou
> Did it work roughly before the ‘core-updates’ merge? This is the first time I tried `guix pack` so I don't know. > As discussed on IRC, could you check “strace -f” the program and > check > where it’s looking for fonts (TTFs?)? I'm not really sure what to look for. Here is the strace -f output

bug#41406: Docker package retains Go references (was Re: Guix closure size of a system?)

2020-05-19 Thread Leo Famulari
The Docker package should not refer to the Go compiler after it is built: On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:22:28PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:58:54PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > I haven't looked at the details, but > > > > --8<---cut here---st

bug#41264: Bootstrap packages fail to build.

2020-05-19 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Mathieu Othacehe writes: Hello Mathieu, >> So stat, lstat, and all other related function will return -EOVERFLOW >> unless their 64 bits stat64, lstat64 counterpart is used. >> >> So I think this means that one cannot build the Guix bootstrap toolchain on >> an >> NVME disk. > > After further in

bug#41384: failing to build util-linux 2.35.1

2020-05-19 Thread Marius Bakke
Josh writes: > I'm consistently running into this error when running `guix pull`. > What can I do to help debug? Try using 'guix pull --keep-failed' and inspect the util-linux test suite logs in /tmp/guix-build-util-linux-2.35.1.drv-0. Did you intentionally disable binary substitutes? signatu

bug#41397: xfce4-terminal not reproducible

2020-05-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
--- /gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8-check +++ /gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8 ├── share │ ├── gnome-control-center │ │ ├── default-apps │ │ │ ├── xfce4-terminal-default-apps.xml │ │ │ │ │ --- /gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1

bug#41397: xfce4-terminal not reproducible

2020-05-19 Thread Marius Bakke
Danny Milosavljevic writes: > output ‘/gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8’ of > ‘/gnu/store/c48jlbvl4n48gkq1g47mv5xf6hyk8dc8-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8.drv’ > differs from > ‘/gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8-check’ from > previous round >

bug#41344: Font broken in GUI application with guix pack

2020-05-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Alexandros Theodotou skribis: > This is the command I ran to generate a pack: > guix pack -RR -S /opt/zrythm/bin=bin -L . zrythm > > I then tried moving this pack to a VM running another distro > (archlinux) and all letters are shown as boxes. I have asked other > people to test it on other

bug#41394: java-testng: again nondeterministic test-failures?

2020-05-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 19 mai 2020 05:27:45 GMT-04:00, "Björn Höfling" a écrit : >Does anyone else have the same problems? > >On my system java-testng sometimes fails nondeterministically within >the check phase: > >=== >TestNG >Total tests run: 1633, Failures: 2, Skips: 0

bug#41387: "Building from Git" on foreign distro starting with NO guix?

2020-05-19 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 18 mai 2020 23:07:42 GMT-04:00, Bengt Richter a écrit : >Hi, > >[~/wb/guix110git/guix]$ ./configure --prefix=$(realpath ./mybuild) >checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c >checking whether build environment is sane... yes >... >... >checking pkg-config is at least version

bug#41400: Current biber version is incompatible with biblatex

2020-05-19 Thread Mikhail Tsykalov
When running biber the following error appears: ERROR - Error: Found biblatex control file version 3.5, expected version 3.4. This means that your biber (2.11) and biblatex (3.12) versions are incompatible. See compat matrix in biblatex or biber PDF documentation.

bug#41397: xfce4-terminal not reproducible

2020-05-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
output ‘/gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8’ of ‘/gnu/store/c48jlbvl4n48gkq1g47mv5xf6hyk8dc8-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8.drv’ differs from ‘/gnu/store/7pjnp69halq4kmi9m0q896p8ss1qmscq-xfce4-terminal-0.8.8-check’ from previous round guix master commit 67c0d7fb9a32065fb77f0

bug#41396: java-kafka-clients fails tests

2020-05-19 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
java-kafka-clients has a failing test: [junit] Running org.apache.kafka.common.network.SslTransportLayerTest [junit] SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder". [junit] SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation [junit] SLF4J: See http://www.

bug#41394: java-testng: again nondeterministic test-failures?

2020-05-19 Thread Björn Höfling
Does anyone else have the same problems? On my system java-testng sometimes fails nondeterministically within the check phase: === TestNG Total tests run: 1633, Failures: 2, Skips: 0 === Failures in :TestNG,

bug#41264: Bootstrap packages fail to build.

2020-05-19 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello, > So stat, lstat, and all other related function will return -EOVERFLOW > unless their 64 bits stat64, lstat64 counterpart is used. > > So I think this means that one cannot build the Guix bootstrap toolchain on an > NVME disk. After further investigations I think that it is needed to pa