bug#39926: Regression introduced by Shepherd 0.7.0 ('make check-system TESTS=btrfs-root-os' fails)

2020-03-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > > [...] > >> Comparing with the above uname output, we can see that it validates the >> hostname matches against "liberigilo", yet it is "gnu"! Perhaps >> Shepherd 0.7.0 introduced some problem with the hostname service? > > Anothe

bug#34276: ‘guix system disk-im age’ successfully builds a bad image

2020-03-19 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Ludovic, I investigated a bit. I managed to get our code to cause a kernel panic upon failure (patch below). However I fail to turn that guest kernel panic into a different QEMU exit code. I tried to use the “pvpanic” paravirtualized device (the ‘pvpanic.ko’ module in the guest, and “-

bug#40015: [bug#40136] [PATCH] * gnu/packages/docker.scm (docker-compose): update to 1.25.4

2020-03-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, thanks for the patch! Pushed to guix master as commit 15c3aa091100160bbe9c81650f9ab7a12bd7964e. pgpNZtqDPku4u.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#40116: GDM: Memory leak in .gnome-shell-real process

2020-03-19 Thread sirgazil via Bug reports for GNU Guix
I tried a virtual machine with my system configuration during 4 hours and couldn't reproduce the leak (I used "guix system vm"). ".gnome-shell-real" kept using about 260 MiB of RAM and it actually went down to 220 at some point. In 4 hours, in my real system, the leak would have been visible. I

bug#40134: cedille build is not reproducible

2020-03-19 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:32:03AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > The differences are in the compiled binary: > > diffoscope --exclude-command stat > /gnu/store/w69pw5xmkix5ga0vqh0q637p1dwsldk5-cedille-1.1.2{,-check} > --- /gnu/store/w69pw5xmkix5ga0vqh0q637p1dwsldk5-cedille-1.1.2 > +++ /gnu/stor

bug#40134: cedille build is not reproducible

2020-03-19 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
The differences are in the compiled binary: diffoscope --exclude-command stat /gnu/store/w69pw5xmkix5ga0vqh0q637p1dwsldk5-cedille-1.1.2{,-check} --- /gnu/store/w69pw5xmkix5ga0vqh0q637p1dwsldk5-cedille-1.1.2 +++ /gnu/store/w69pw5xmkix5ga0vqh0q637p1dwsldk5-cedille-1.1.2-check ├── bin │ ├── cedille

bug#40123: glibc-locales: links missing in root user profile

2020-03-19 Thread david larsson
On 2020-03-18 22:57, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote: Den ons 18 mars 2020 21:48david larsson skrev: This led me to find my problem: For some reason, my ~root/.guix-profile was pointing to the current-guix profile rather than the guix-profile. It could have been me who did that. :( Anyway, problem

bug#40123: glibc-locales: links missing in root user profile

2020-03-19 Thread david larsson
On 2020-03-19 02:26, Leo Famulari wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 09:47:39PM +0100, david larsson wrote: Not so fast! I just did the same yesterday using the install-script but on a RedHat server, and my /root/.config/guix/current pointed at /var/guix/profiles/per-user/MYOTHERUSER/current-guix i

bug#36634: (no subject)

2020-03-19 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello, Chris Marusich writes: I see the patch was incorporated into Guix master in commit aa1f0896fb15a0bdcc5474839c8afdbb2520d603. That is good, and I think this issue can be resolved. If nobody follows up in a few days' time, let's close the bug report. I created 38032 on guix-patches an

bug#36109: [bug#40129] [PATCH] gnu: gpa: Add phase wrap-program.

2020-03-19 Thread Marius Bakke
Brice Waegeneire writes: > Fixes > > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gpa)[arguments]: Add phase wrap-program. Applied, thanks! [...] > + (add-after 'install 'wrap-program > + (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) > + (let ((out

bug#30299: [core-updates] shepherd fails tests on all systems except x86_64

2020-03-19 Thread Marius Bakke
Brice Waegeneire writes: > Hello, > > Does this bug is still relevant? > It was reported on core-updates 2 years ago with shepherd 0.3.2. > I can't see any CI failures[0] related to a test failing since cuirass > was setup, the only time the build of shepherd failed[1] it wasn't due > to a test

bug#30299: [core-updates] shepherd fails tests on all systems except x86_64

2020-03-19 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello, Does this bug is still relevant? It was reported on core-updates 2 years ago with shepherd 0.3.2. I can't see any CI failures[0] related to a test failing since cuirass was setup, the only time the build of shepherd failed[1] it wasn't due to a test. I wasn't able to reproduce the failin