Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I don’t think we explicitly discussed it, but my assumption is that
> we’re delaying merging of ‘core-updates’ into ‘master’ until
> ‘core-updates-next’ becomes ‘core-updates’. Is this what you had in
> mind? (I’m asking because ‘core-updates’ was almost ent
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Unless I’m mistaken, this bug can be closed now, right?
Yep! This can be closed now, since we're running the unified code and we
have another ticket for tracking this in 'guix system reconfigure'.
Regards,
Jakob
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ludovic,
Apologies for not participating in this thread until just now.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Jakob, does that ring a bell?
Yes, this was fixed by #36880.
Regards,
Jakob
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Jul 26 2019 23:55:23 d23a00b599be56694065bd274184b9289fb8b85c
Jul 29 2019 11:32:04 ab20b3ed9152c7c95d0d2c6b2d65e29983ab57ce
Jul 29 2019 23:52:32 18c4b0a27705773e423fb17310394204b7295d4a
Jul 30 2019 before 22:03 nckx saves me (last messages of
http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2019-07-3
Hello,
"Xavier Montillet" skribis:
> All I can say for sure is that the bug was in the guix pull'ed version at
> some point in the week leading to July 31 (and most likely on July 30), and
> that the bug is no longer in the version of July 31 evening.
Could you run ‘guix pull -l 1m’ (for this
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> The attached procedure computes the search paths of a package based on
> its run-time dependencies. ‘profile-derivation’ could use this to
> compute its ‘etc/profile’ file and its ‘manifest’ file.
One difficulty with this approach is that search paths are currently a
Hello,
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
[...]
>> I think what needs to be done is the following:
>>
>> (1) commit 78ced7975b0665e810834391d826c9f0ef7277e1 on 'wip-binaries'
>> should be reverted, to downgrade mescc-tools to the 0.5.2 release.
>>
>> (2) The 'wip-binaries' tarb
Hi Jakob,
zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Oh, I see. To me that’s completely orthogonal to ‘guix deploy’ though,
>> in that ‘guix system reconfigure’ and ‘guix deploy’ should use the
>> same code for that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
>
> Yea
